Patient-specific versus conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: peri-operative and cost differences

J Arthroplasty. 2014 Nov;29(11):2065-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.019. Epub 2014 Jun 28.

Abstract

The role of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is yet to be clearly defined. Current evidence evaluating peri-operative and cost differences against conventional TKA is unclear. We reviewed 356 TKAs between July 2008 and April 2013; 306 TKAs used patient-specific instrumentation while 50 had conventional instrumentation. The patient-specific instrumentation cohort averaged 20.4 min less surgical time (P < 0.01) and had a 42% decrease in operating room turnover time (P = 0.022). At our institution, the money saved through increased operating room efficiency offset the cost of the custom cutting blocks and pre-operative advanced imaging. Routine use of patient-specific TKA can be performed with less surgical time, no increase in peri-operative morbidity, and at no increased cost when compared to conventional TKA.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness; custom cutting blocks; patient-specific instrumentation; patient-specific total knee arthroplasty; total knee arthroplasty.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / economics
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / instrumentation*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Joint Diseases / surgery*
  • Knee Joint / surgery*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Operative Time
  • Surgery, Computer-Assisted / economics*