Regular Article
Can quality circles improve hospital-acquired infection control?

https://doi.org/10.1053/jhin.2000.0762Get rights and content

Abstract

It is a fundamental principle of continuous quality improvement (CQI) that processes should be the objects of quality improvement. The objective of this study was to improve process quality concerning the prevention of hospital-acquired infections in surgical departments and intensive care units by a continuous quality improvement (CQI) approach based mainly on quality circles. This approach was evaluated in a prospective controlled intervention study in medium-size acute care hospitals (four intervention and four control hospitals). During two intervention periods (each 10 months) four external physicians with training in hospital epidemiology and infection control introduced and supervised quality circles in the intervention hospitals. Process quality was assessed by interviewing senior staff members before the first and after the second intervention period using standardized questionnaires. The gold standard process quality was defined on the basis of the CDC/HICPAC-guidelines for the prevention of hospital-acquired infections. Most of the evaluated aspects of process quality belonged to the HICPAC-categories IA and IB respectively, the CDC category I.

Fifty quality circle sessions were performed in the four intervention hospitals of which 28 were dealing directly with key subjects in infection control. In the intervention hospitals, 19.8% of evaluated aspects of process quality which concerned the prevention of hospital-acquired infections were improved compared to only 6.9% in the control hospitals (P<0.05). Sixty-six point seven percent of positive changes in process quality were initiated by the results of the quality circles.

Our study demonstrates that a CQI approach based on infection control quality circles can lead to a substantial improvement of process quality regarding the prevention of hospital-acquired infections.

References (22)

  • SI Kelleghan et al.

    An effective continous quality improvement approach to the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia

    Am J Infect Control

    (1993)
  • JS Garner et al.

    CDC Definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988

    Am J Infect Control

    (1988)
  • RW Haley et al.

    The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs inpreventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1985)
  • A Donabedian

    The quality of care: how can it be assessed

    JAMA

    (1988)
  • MD Decker

    Continuous quality improvement

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (1992)
  • G Laffel et al.

    The case for using industrial quality management science in health care organizations

    JAMA

    (1989)
  • DA Goldmann et al.

    Hospital based continuous quality improvement: a realistic appraisal

    Clin Perform Qual Health Care

    (1993)
  • GA Joiner et al.

    Utilizing quality assurance as a tool for reducing the risk of nosocomial ventilator-associated pneumonia

    Am J Med Qual

    (1996)
  • DG Dumigan et al.

    Utilizing National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System data to improve urinary tract infection rates in three intensive-care units

    Clin Perform Qual Health Care

    (1998)
  • R Grol

    Implementing guidelines in general practice

    Qual Health Care

    (1992)
  • M Harter et al.

    Goals,content and evaluation of training seminars forquality circle moderators

    Z ärztl Fortbild

    (1996)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Green quality circle: Achieving sustainable manufacturing with low investment

      2022, Resources, Conservation and Recycling Advances
    • The effect of quality circles on job satisfaction and quality of work-life of staff in emergency medical services

      2013, International Emergency Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Abo al-hol et al. (2006) reported significant improvement of employee’s job satisfaction in quality circle groups in five Malaysian industrial companies. Forster et al. (2000) reported that applying quality circles led to major improvements in the quality of infection control procedures in hospitals. Few studies have been conducted on the application of quality circles as a method of participatory management, and no such studies have been done in emergency medical services.

    • Results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial of statistical process control charts and structured diagnostic tools to reduce ward-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the CHART Project

      2008, Journal of Hospital Infection
      Citation Excerpt :

      The monthly delivery and review of control charts to discuss IPC performance created a process somewhat akin to ‘quality circles’, i.e. small regular meetings to discuss improving the quality of care delivered to patients. Other investigators have previously demonstrated the benefit of quality circles in IPC.25 Some ICTs also used control charts to promote and demonstrate their quality and commitment to IPC.

    • The role of the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in patient care, surgical education, research and faculty development

      2005, American Journal of Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      The latter are disseminated with the annual report. Feedback and performance comparisons such as that offered by the NSQIP are uniquely effective in changing physicians’ behavior [27–31]. Despite this evidence, with the exception of specific clinical programs such as cardiac surgery [32,33], the private sector currently does not possess a standard method for comprehensive surgical outcomes assessment and comparative institutional risk-adjusted performance feedback.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    f1

    Correspondence to: F. D. Daschner, MD, Institute of Environmental Medicine and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Fax: +49 761 2705485; E-mail:[email protected]

    View full text