Skip to main content
Log in

Outcomes of telephone medical care

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To document the outcomes of a telephone coverage system and identify patient characteristics that may predict these outcomes.

DESIGN: Telephone survey.

SETTING: An academic outpatient medical practice that has a physician telephone coverage service.

PATIENTS: All patients (483) who called during the 3-week study period to speak to a physician were evaluated, and for the 180 patients with symptoms, attempts were made to survey them by telephone 1 week after their initial telephone call.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean age of the 180 patients was 41 years, 71% were female, and 56% belonged to commercial managed care plans. In the week after the initial telephone call, the following outcomes were reported: 27% of the patients had no further contact with the practice; 9% filled a prescription medication; 19% called the practice again; 48% kept an earlier appointment in the practice; 3% saw an internist elsewhere; 8% saw a specialist; 8% went to an emergency department; 4% were admitted to a hospital. Of the 180 patients who called with symptoms, 160 (89%) were successfully contacted for survey. Eighty-seven percent of these 160 patients rated their satisfaction with the care they received over the telephone as excellent, very good, or good. In multivariate analysis, patients’ own health perception identified those most likely to have symptom relief (p=.002), and symptom relief, in turn, was a strong predictor of high patient satisfaction (p=.006). Thirty-three percent of the 160 patients reported that they would have gone to an emergency department if a physician were not available by telephone.

CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, younger patients, female patients, and patients in commercial managed care plans used the telephone most frequently. Also, the telephone provided a viable alternative to emergency department and walk-in visits. Overall satisfaction with telephone medicine was high, and the strongest predictors of high patient satisfaction were symptom relief and patients’ own health perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Radecki SE, Neville RE, Girard RA. Telephone patient management by primary care physicians. Med Care. 1989;27:817–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morrison RE, Arheart KL, Rimner W. Telephone medicine in a southern university private practice. Am J Med Sci. 1993;306:157–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson BE, Johnson CA. Telephone medicine: a general internal medicine experience. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:234–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Peters RM. After-hours telephone calls to general and subspecialty internists: an observational study. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:554–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenhouse DL, Probst JC. After-hours telephone calls in a family practice residency: volume, seriousness, and patient satisfaction. Fam Med. 1995;27(8):525–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wasson J, Gaudette C, Whaley F, Sauvigne A, Baribeau P, Welch HG. Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic follow-up. JAMA. 1992;267:1788–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Daugird AJ, Spencer DC. Characteristics of patients who highly utilize telephone medical care in a private practice. J Fam Pract. 1989;29:59–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bertera EM, Bertera RL. The cost-effectiveness of telephone vs. clinic counseling for hypertensive patients: a pilot study. Am J Public Health. 1981;71(6):626–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagle JP, McMahon K, Barbour M, Allen D. Evaluation of the use and usefulness of telephone consultations in one general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1992;42:190–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dale J, Crouch R, Patel A, Williams S. Patients telephoning A&E for advice: a comparison of expectations and outcomes. J Accid Emerg Med. 1997;14:21–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sorum PC. Compensating physicians for telephone calls. JAMA. 1994;272:1949–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Braithwaite SS, Unferth NO. Phone fees: a justification of physician charges. J Clin Ethics. 1993;4(3):219–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Isaacman DJ. Telephone fees: are they worth it? J Clin Ethics. 1993;4(3):271–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Studdiford JS, Panitch KN, Snyderman DA, Pharr ME. The telephone in primary care. Prim Care. 1996;23(1):83–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fishbein M, Azjen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. Don Mills, NY: Addison-Wesley; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Flannery MT, Moses GA, Cykert S, et al. Telephone management training in internal medicine residencies: a national survey of program directors. Acad Med. 1995;70:1138–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zylke JW. Physicians need better line on how, when to respond to patients via telephone. JAMA. 1990;264:1797–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hannis MD, Hazard RL, Rothschild M, Elnicki DM, Keyserling TC, DeVellis RF, TELI group. Physician attitudes regarding telephone medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:678–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Elnicki DM, Hannis M, Flannery M, TELI group. The inadequate preparation of residents for telephone interactions with ambulatory patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9(suppl 2):74. Abstract.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hannis MD, Elnicki DM, Morris DK, Flannery MT, TELI group. Can you hold please? How internal medicine residents deal with patient telephone calls. Am J Med Sci. 1994;308(6):349–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fleming MF, Skochelak SE, Curtis P, Evens S. Evaluating the effectiveness of a telephone medicine curriculum. Med Care. 1988;26(2):211–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Elnicki DM, Keyserling TC, Devallis RF, et al. Issues affecting residents’ attitudes about telephone medicine for ambulatory patients. Teach Learn Med. 1996;8(3):142–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cykert S, Flannery MT, Huber EC, et al. Telephone medical care administered by internal medicine residents: concerns of program directors and implications for residency training. Am J Med Sci. 1997;314(3):198–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delichatsios, H., Callahan, M. & Charlson, M. Outcomes of telephone medical care. J GEN INTERN MED 13, 579–585 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00179.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00179.x

Key words

Navigation