Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Heat Loss Prevention: A Systematic Review of Occlusive Skin Wrap for Premature Neonates

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To systematically identify and synthesize investigations of the effectiveness of occlusive skin wrap for reducing heat loss in premature infants born at less than 36 weeks gestations.

STUDY DESIGN:

Systematic review.

RESULTS:

Three randomized controlled trials (RCT) and five historical controlled trials (HCT) were included. Meta-analysis shows wrapped infants had significantly higher admission temperatures than unwrapped infants (RCTs WMD 0.63°C, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38, 0.87; HCTs WMD 0.96°C, 95% CI 0.66, 1.27). A statistically significant difference in mortality was not found between wrapped and unwrapped infants in the RCTs (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.36, 1.45) or the HCTs (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.51, 1.13).

CONCLUSIONS:

The findings suggest that occlusive skin wrap prevents heat loss in premature infants. The meta-analysis lacked the power to provide definitive results regarding the effect of wrap on mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Silverman WA, Fertig JW, Berger AP . The influence of the thermal environment upon the survival of newly born premature infants. Pediatrics 1958;21:876–885.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johanson RB, Spencer SA, Rolfe P, Jones P, Malla DS . Effect of post-delivery care of neonatal body temperature. Acta Pediatr 1998;81:859–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Costeloe K, Hennessy F, Gibson AT, Marlow N, Wilkinson AR, for the EPICure Study Group. The EPICure study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 2000;106:659–671.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vohra V, Frent G, Campbell V, Abbott M, Whyte R . Effect of polyethylene occlusive skin wrapping on heat loss in very low birth weight infants at delivery: a randomized trial. J Pediatr 1999;134(5):547–551.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beinder E, Trojean A, Bucher HU, Huch A, Huch R . Control of skin blood flow in pre- and full-term infants. Biol Neonate 1994;51:7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Karlsson H, Olegard R, Nilsson K . Regional skin temperature, heat flow and conductance in preterm neonates nursed in low and neutral environmental temperature. Acta Paediatr 1996;85:81–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chameides L, Hazinski MF . Pediatric Advanced Life Support. Dallas: American Heart Association; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Knobel R, Vohra S, Holditch-Davis D, Lehmann C . Network Survey of Heat Loss Prevention (HeLP) in the Delivery Room (paper presentation). Southern Research Nursing Society: International Nursing Research. 2004.

  9. Knobel R, Wimmer J, Holbert D . Heat loss prevention for preterm infants in the delivery room. J Perinatol 2004;25:304–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lenclen R, Mazraani M, Jugie M, et al. Reducinq heat loss in preterm infants at delivery with polyethylene bags. [French]. Arch Pediatr 2002;9(3):238–244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lyon AJ, Stenson B . Cold comfort for babies (Letter). Arch Dis Child 2004;89:F93–F94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer MP . Swaddling and Heat Loss (Letter). Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003;88:F256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Newton T, Watkinson M . Preventing hypothermia at birth in preterm babies: at a cost of overheating some? (Letter). Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003;88:F256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bjorklund LJ . Reducing heat loss at birth in very preterm infants (Letter). J Pediatr 2000;137:739–740.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary. Control Clin Trials 1996;17(1):1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG . Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 1995;273(5):408–412.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Guyatt G, Haynes B, Jaeschke R, et al. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. Chicago: American Medical Association Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pearson ES . The percentage limits for the distribution of range in samples from a normal population. Biometrika 1932;24:404–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook 4.2.2 [Web Page]. March 2004; Available at http://www.cochrane.dk/cochrane/handbook/hbook.htm(Accessed 16 June 2004).

  20. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vohra S, Roberts R, Zhang B, Janes M, Schmidt B . Heat loss prevention in the delivery room: a randomized clinical trial in very preterm infants. J Pediatr 2004;145:750–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baumgart S . Reduction of oxygen consumption, insensible water loss, and radiant heat demand with use of a plastic blanket for low-birth-weight infants under radiant warmers. Pediatrics 1984;74(6):1022–1028.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baumgart S, Fox WW, Polin RA . Physiologic implications of two different heat shields for infants under radiant warmers. J Pediatr 1982;100(5):787–790.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Baumgart S, Engle WD, Fox WW, Polin RA . Effect of heat shielding on convective and evaporative heat losses and on radiant heat transfer in the premature infant. J Pediatr 1981;99(6):948–956.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Walterspiel JN . Design and performance of blanket heat shields for neonates. Acta Paediatr Scand 1991;80(11):993–998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Marks KH, Williams RK, Groff HC, Jeffrey M . The Micro-Environment of Premature-infants Under a Plexiglass Dome and Plastic Blanket. Pediatr Res 1981;15(4):671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brice JE, Rutter N . Reduction of skin water loss in the newborn. II. Clinical trial of two methods in very low birthweight babies. Arch Dis Child 1981;56(9):673–675.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Baumgart S . Radiant energy and insensible water loss in the premature newborn infant nursed under a radiant warmer. [Review] [62 refs]. Clin Perinatol 1982;9(3):483–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Behrman RE, Kleigman RM, Jenson HB . Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 16th ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: W.B. Saunders Company; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  30. World Health Organization. Thermal Protection of the Newborn: A Practical Guide. Geneva: Maternal and Newborn Health/Safe Motherhood Unit: Division of Reproductive Health World Health Organization; 2004.

  31. Vermont Oxford Network. Vermont Oxford Network [Web Page]. Available at http://www.vtoxford.org/(Accessed 8 December 2004).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cramer, K., Wiebe, N., Hartling, L. et al. Heat Loss Prevention: A Systematic Review of Occlusive Skin Wrap for Premature Neonates. J Perinatol 25, 763–769 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211392

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211392

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links