Original Article
Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Abstract

Objectives

To present estimates of clinically meaningful or minimal important changes for the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) after joint replacement surgery.

Study Design and Setting

Secondary data analysis of the NHS patient-reported outcome measures data set that included 82,415 patients listed for hip replacement surgery and 94,015 patients listed for knee replacement surgery was performed.

Results

Anchor-based methods revealed that meaningful change indices at the group level [minimal important change (MIC)], for example in cohort studies, were ∼11 points for the OHS and ∼9 points for the OKS. For assessment of individual patients, receiver operating characteristic analysis produced MICs of 8 and 7 points for OHS and OKS, respectively. Additionally, the between group minimal important difference (MID), which allows the estimation of a clinically relevant difference in change scores from baseline when comparing two groups, that is, for clinical trials, was estimated to be ∼5 points for both the OKS and the OHS. The distribution-based minimal detectable change (MDC90) estimates for the OKS and OHS were 4 and 5 points, respectively.

Conclusion

This study has produced and discussed estimates of minimal important change/difference for the OKS/OHS. These estimates should be used in the power calculations and the interpretation of studies using the OKS and OHS. The MDC90 (∼4 points OKS and ∼5 points OHS) represents the smallest possible detectable change for each of these instruments, thus indicating that any lower value would fall within measurement error.

Keywords

Minimal important change
Minimal important difference
Hip replacement
Knee replacement
Responder definition
Study designs

Cited by (0)

K.H. and D.J.B. contributed equally to this work and should be regarded as joint first authors.

Conflict of interest: J.D. is one of the original inventors of the Oxford Hip Score and Oxford Knee Score. She has received consultancy payments, via Isis Innovation, in relation to work involving both questionnaires. The other authors have no conflicts of interest.

Funding: This work was supported under the general program of research undertaken by the Nuffield Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences as a National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Unit- Musculoskeletal Disease.