AJM onlineBrief observationMindfulness-Based Laboratory Reduction: Reducing Utilization Through Trainee-Led Daily ‘Time Outs’
Section snippets
Study Population
The intervention was conducted on our 26-bed medical clinical teaching unit at the Royal Victoria Hospital in Montreal, Quebec (517 total beds). This unit has an established culture of quality improvement, with twice-monthly dedicated academic rounds attended by the ward team.
Intervention and Implementation Data Sources
At baseline, doctors would write admission orders for daily blood tests, as was the prevailing culture. Orders were written on paper and transcribed into the computer by administrative personnel. The computer system did
Results
The total, per-period, and per-admission laboratory costs are shown in Table 1. Crudely, the average cost per admitted patient decreased from $117 to $66, with an estimated savings based on 985 admissions of $50,657. In the time series analysis, after adjusting for fiscal period and the presence of our intervention, there was a significant reduction in the overall number of per-patient tests, complete blood counts, and electrolyte panels (Figures 1 and 2; P <.001 for all level and time trend
Discussion
Providing tertiary care has become increasingly complex, and the pressure for residents to accomplish multiple competing tasks throughout the day has likely influenced routine ordering practices on the clinical teaching unit. The concept of mindfulness involves removing oneself from autopilot; the pairing of regular education sessions with periodically mandated reassessment of tests or medications is a type of “medical mindfulness,” which successfully cultivated attention directed at an area of
Conclusion
We reduced routine laboratory testing on our clinical teaching unit using daily structured laboratory “time outs.” Fewer blood draws translate to less patient discomfort and increased efficiency of phlebotomists, nurses, and physicians. Laboratory timeouts lend themselves well to a changing culture toward a more mindful medical practice, addressing many of the drivers of test overuse for hospitalized patients. This is the type of inexpensive focused intervention that is fundamental to moving
Acknowledgment
We are especially grateful to George Christodoulou for his help in designing the intervention. We would like to thank the McGill University Health Centre's Department of Quality, Patient Safety & Performance for providing the laboratory data. We also thank all faculty and residents who participated in the project, made it a success, and took it to other units.
References (11)
- et al.
Low diagnostic utility of rechecking hemoglobins within 24 hours in hospitalized patients
Am J Med
(2016) - et al.
Novel low-resource intervention reduces urinary catheter use and associated urinary tract infections: role of outcome measure bias?
Am J Infect Control
(2015) - et al.
Do we know what inappropriate laboratory utilization is? A systematic review of laboratory clinical audits
JAMA
(1998) - et al.
Continuous improvement, quality control, and cost containment in clinical laboratory testing. Enhancement of physicians' laboratory-ordering practices
Arch Pathol Lab Med
(1994) - et al.
Evaluation of utilization of laboratory tests in a hospital emergency room
Am J Public Health
(1980)
Cited by (15)
The Value Proposition for Pathologists: A Population Health Approach
2020, Academic PathologyCitation Excerpt :Changes to CPOE, including best practice alerts, have been used to encourage orders of needed tests, to discourage duplicative and obsolete testing, and to prevent misordering of “look-alike” tests.22,23,28 It is increasingly recognized that CPOE changes alone achieve only a part of the needed result29,30 and that a multimodal approach involving clinical colleagues is often more effective.18,23,31-33 Other forms of utilization management can involve removing tests from the menu (in effect creating “test formularies”), requiring a pathologist review of specific tests, especially low-volume, high-cost reference laboratory tests, and limiting some testing to expert subspecialists.23,28
Resident-Sensitive Processes of Care: Impact of Surgical Residents on Inpatient Testing
2019, Journal of the American College of SurgeonsCitation Excerpt :The focus of this study was not investigating the predictive value of any study in determining postoperative events; however, one could potentially investigate this type of question with these data. Although many investigations have evaluated interventions to reduce the unnecessary burden of excessive testing,7,11-13 few studies have evaluated variables associated with frequency of testing, and none have specifically investigated the surgical population. Our analysis is the first to establish resident- and patient-level variables associated with increased testing.
A systematic review of evidence-based practices for clinical education and health care delivery in the clinical teaching unit
2022, CMAJCitation Excerpt :Sixteen studies explored resource stewardship in the CTU setting, of which 14 were either medium or high quality (Table 2).38-53 Most studies introduced an educational39,46-53 or process change38,39,45 intervention, with the goal of improving cost awareness and promoting resource stewardship. Examples of process changes from medium- and high-quality studies included restricting standing laboratory orders,45 unbundling order sets38 and implementing a novel electronic decision support tool for deprescribing.39
Diagnostic Stewardship for Healthcare-Associated Infections: Opportunities and Challenges to Safely Reduce Test Use
2018, Infection Control and Hospital EpidemiologyStrategies to Reduce Diagnostic Blood Loss and Anemia in Hospitalized Patients: A Scoping Review
2023, Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Funding: This project was completed without any internal or external funding.
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Authorship: All authors had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the analysis.
Study concept and design: RRS, TCL; Acquisition of data: RRS, TCL, EGM; Analysis and interpretation of data: RRS, TCL, EGM; Drafting of the manuscript: TCL, EGM; Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: TCL, RRS, EGM; Statistical analysis: TCL, EGM; Study supervision: TCL, EGM.
- 1
For the purposes of authorship, EGM and RRS share credit as first named author.