Articles
Effectiveness of insertion and maintenance bundles to prevent central-line-associated bloodstream infections in critically ill patients of all ages: a systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00409-0Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are a major problem in intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide. We aimed to quantify the effectiveness of central-line bundles (insertion or maintenance or both) to prevent these infections.

Methods

We searched Embase, MEDLINE OvidSP, Web-of-Science, and Cochrane Library to identify studies reporting the implementation of central-line bundles in adult ICU, paediatric ICU (PICU), or neonatal ICU (NICU) patients. We searched for studies published between Jan 1, 1990, and June 30, 2015. For the meta-analysis, crude estimates of infections were pooled by use of a DerSimonian and Laird random effect model. The primary outcome was the number of CLABSIs per 1000 catheter-days before and after implementation. Incidence risk ratios (IRRs) were obtained by use of random-effects models.

Findings

We initially identified 4337 records, and after excluding duplicates and those ineligible, 96 studies met the eligibility criteria, 79 of which contained sufficient information for a meta-analysis. Median CLABSIs incidence were 5·7 per 1000 catheter-days (range 1·2–46·3; IQR 3·1–9·5) on adult ICUs; 5·9 per 1000 catheter-days (range 2·6–31·1; 4·8–9·4) on PICUs; and 8·4 per 1000 catheter-days (range 2·6–24·1; 3·7–16·0) on NICUs. After implementation of central-line bundles the CLABSI incidence ranged from 0 to 19·5 per 1000 catheter-days (median 2·6, IQR 1·2–4·4) in all types of ICUs. In our meta-analysis the incidence of infections decreased significantly from median 6·4 per 1000 catheter-days (IQR 3·8–10·9) to 2·5 per 1000 catheter-days (1·4–4·8) after implementation of bundles (IRR 0·44, 95% CI 0·39–0·50, p<0·0001; I2=89%).

Interpretation

Implementation of central-line bundles has the potential to reduce the incidence of CLABSIs.

Funding

None.

Introduction

Health-care-associated infections are a major problem in intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide.1 They have been associated not only with impaired immunity of critically ill patients but also with the presence of central lines, urine catheters, and invasive ventilation.2, 3 The true number of health-care-associated bloodstream infections is not known, but 18 000 cases are estimated to have occurred in intensive care in 2009 in the USA, which were associated with a mortality as high as 25%.4 However, the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) stated that the pooled incidence of central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in INICC ICUs (ie, in Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America), of 4·9 infections per 1000 central-line-days, is nearly five times higher than that reported from comparable ICUs in the USA.5 Most hospital-acquired bloodstream infections are associated with the presence of a central-line.6, 7, 8 CLABSIs are the most common health-care-associated infections in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), and subsequently in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and adult ICUs. Furthermore, CLABSIs are responsible for substantial mortality, morbidity, extended duration of stay in hospital, and additional costs to hospitals.9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Evidence suggests that CLABSI prevention is crucial for safe patient care for all age groups.

The Institute for Healthcare Improvement developed so-called bundles to improve patient care. A bundle is a set of evidence-based practices that have been proven to improve patient outcomes, provided they are completed collectively and reliably. In 2006, Pronovost and colleagues wrote a key paper14 in which they concluded that implementation of central-line insertion bundles significantly reduced CLABSI incidence in adult ICUs. Growing evidence suggests that addition of a maintenance bundle to a central-line insertion bundle might be even more effective in prevention of CLABSIs in children and infants.15, 16, 17, 18 A central-line insertion and maintenance bundle is defined as a combination of interventions, such as full barrier precaution during the insertion of a central line, cleaning of the skin with chlorhexidine, application of appropriate hand hygiene, and prompt removal when the central line is no longer needed.

Research in context

Evidence before this study

Health-care associated infections are a large problem in intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide. Risk factors for these infections are associated with both invasive procedures such as insertion and maintenance care of central lines in neonatal, paediatric, and adult ICU patients. Studies have previously investigated the effectiveness of central lines in adult ICUs, including a 2014 systematic review. We focused on effectiveness of the implementation of central-line bundles and the estimated cost savings on the entire lifespan of patients. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Web-of-Science, Cochrane Library, and PubMed (with no language restriction) using a combination of search terms of “catheterization, central venous/adverse effects”, “infection control/methods”, “intensive care units”, and “quality control”. We included literature published between Jan 1, 1990, and June 30, 2015.

Added value of this study

Our study makes an important contribution to clinical practice and shows there is an overwhelming number of publications reporting implementation of central-line bundles are effective in ICU patients, including neonates and children. We show that implementation of central-line bundles are effective in low-income and middle-income countries as well as in high-income countries. Our findings show that central-line bundles are cost saving.

Implications of all the available evidence

Health-care professionals should make efforts to implement central-line bundles in low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries, and stop undertaking new effectiveness studies.

CLABSI prevention requires broad practice changes and implementation of multifaceted programmes to improve infection control.14, 19, 20 It also requires changes in the behaviour of health-care professionals through education, performance assessments, provision of feedback, use of teamwork, and improvements in the overall safety culture.21

A rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of central-line bundles has not yet been done in critically ill patients, of all ages, during their entire life span. Robust evidence of bundle effectiveness in individual studies is restricted on account of small sample sizes.15 Additionally, compliance with the application of bundles is not always consistently assessed. No clear evidence shows that central-line bundles are cost effective. Furthermore, it is unclear what implementation strategy would be best to increase bundle compliance. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the effectiveness of the implementation of central-line bundles to prevent CLABSIs in adult, paediatric, and neonatal patients in ICUs.

Section snippets

Search strategy and selection criteria

We did this systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.22 The research protocol was registered in the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42014007303).23

We systematically searched for articles published between Jan 1, 1990, and June 30, 2015, in the Embase, MEDLINE OvidSP, Web-of-Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases using the search terms

Results

We initially identified 4337 records. After removal of duplicates, the search strategy yielded 2715 unique publications, 191 of which were deemed relevant based on the title and abstract and were retrieved. Of these, and after full-text reading, 96 records were used in the systematic review (figure 1), which included 60 records in adult ICUs,32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70,

Discussion

The main finding of this systematic review and meta-analysis of 2370 ICUs, is a significant association between implementation of central-line insertion and maintenance bundles and reduction of the incidence of CLABSIs in all ICU settings. The risk reduction was more conspicuous in studies with a CLABSI incidence of five or higher per 1000 catheter-days at baseline than in studies with a CLASBSI incidence lower than five per 1000 catheter-days.

A high baseline incidence of CLABSIs was associated

References (140)

  • D Galpern et al.

    Effectiveness of a central line bundle campaign on line-associated infections in the intensive care unit

    Surgery

    (2008)
  • K Guerin et al.

    Reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infections by implementation of a postinsertion care bundle

    Am J Infect Control

    (2010)
  • S Hansen et al.

    Time-series analysis to observe the impact of a centrally organized educational intervention on the prevention of central-line-associated bloodstream infections in 32 German intensive care units

    J Hosp Infect

    (2014)
  • C Hocking et al.

    Using a combined nursing and medical approach to reduce the incidence of central line associated bacteraemia in a New Zealand critical care unit: a clinical audit

    Intensive Crit Care Nurs

    (2013)
  • N Jaggi et al.

    Impact of an International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium multidimensional approach on central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in adult intensive care units in eight cities in India

    Int J Infect Dis

    (2013)
  • I Khalid et al.

    Itemizing the bundle: achieving and maintaining “zero” central line-associated bloodstream infection for over a year in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia

    Am J Infect Control

    (2013)
  • BS Koll et al.

    The CLABs collaborative: a regionwide effort to improve the quality of care in hospitals

    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf

    (2008)
  • RD Lobo et al.

    Impact of an educational program and policy changes on decreasing catheter-associated bloodstream infections in a medical intensive care unit in Brazil

    Am J Infect Control

    (2005)
  • RD Lobo et al.

    Evaluation of interventions to reduce catheter-associated bloodstream infection: continuous tailored education versus one basic lecture

    Am J Infect Control

    (2010)
  • AR Marra et al.

    Impact of a program to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infection in the zero tolerance era

    Am J Infect Control

    (2010)
  • M Palomar Martinez et al.

    Prevention of bacteremia related with ICU catheters by multifactorial intervention: a report of the pilot study

    Med Intensiva

    (2010)
  • AP Paula et al.

    The long-term impact of a program to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in a surgical intensive care unit

    Clinics

    (2012)
  • ML Render et al.

    Evidence-based practice to reduce central line infections

    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf

    (2006)
  • VD Rosenthal et al.

    Effect of an infection control program using education and performance feedback on rates of intravascular device-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units in Argentina

    Am J Infect Control

    (2003)
  • GD Sacks et al.

    Reducing the rate of catheter-associated bloodstream infections in a surgical intensive care unit using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement central line bundle

    Am J Surg

    (2014)
  • RP Shannon et al.

    Using real-time problem solving to eliminate central line infections

    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf

    (2006)
  • KA Thom et al.

    Successful implementation of a unit-based quality nurse to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections

    Am J Infect Control

    (2014)
  • DK Warren et al.

    The effect of an education program on the incidence of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection in a medical ICU

    Chest

    (2004)
  • PP Wu et al.

    Decreasing catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit: Interventions in a medical center in central Taiwan

    J Microbiol Immunol Infect

    (2012)
  • EM Young et al.

    Translating evidence into practice to prevent central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections: a systems-based intervention

    Am J Infect Control

    (2006)
  • GB Allen et al.

    A multitiered strategy of simulation training, kit consolidation, and electronic documentation is associated with a reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infections

    Am J Infect Control

    (2014)
  • A Apisarnthanarak et al.

    Effectiveness of a catheter-associated bloodstream infection bundle in a Thai tertiary care center: a 3-year study

    Am J Infect Control

    (2010)
  • M Espiau et al.

    Incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection in an intensive care unit

    An Pediatr

    (2011)
  • M Luiz Abramczyk et al.

    Preventing catheter-associated infections in the pediatric intensive care unit: impact of an educational program surveying policies for insertion and care of central venous catheters in a Brazilian teaching hospital

    Braz J Infect Dis

    (2011)
  • SE Miller et al.

    Central line-associated bloodstream infection prevention

    Curr Opin Infect Dis

    (2012)
  • DM Vandijck et al.

    Prevention of nosocomial infections in intensive care patients

    Nurs Crit Care

    (2010)
  • Vital signs: central line-associated blood stream infections—United States, 2001, 2008, and 2009

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2011)
  • H Wisplinghoff et al.

    Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2004)
  • MJ Richards et al.

    Nosocomial infections in combined medical-surgical intensive care units in the United States

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (2000)
  • O Lyytikainen et al.

    Nosocomial bloodstream infections in Finnish hospitals during 1999–2000

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2002)
  • SI Blot et al.

    Clinical and economic outcomes in critically ill patients with nosocomial catheter-related bloodstream infections

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2005)
  • KA Halton et al.

    Cost-effectiveness of a central venous catheter care bundle

    PLoS One

    (2010)
  • F Higuera et al.

    Attributable cost and length of stay for patients with central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection in Mexico City intensive care units: a prospective, matched analysis

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (2007)
  • P Pronovost et al.

    An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU

    N Engl J Med

    (2006)
  • MJ Bizzarro et al.

    A quality improvement initiative to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in a neonatal intensive care unit

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (2010)
  • HE Jeffries et al.

    Prevention of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections in pediatric intensive care units: a performance improvement collaborative

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (2009)
  • MR Miller et al.

    Decreasing PICU catheter-associated bloodstream infections: NACHRI's quality transformation efforts

    Pediatrics

    (2010)
  • SM Berenholtz et al.

    Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit

    Crit Care Med

    (2004)
  • PJ Pronovost et al.

    Sustaining reductions in catheter related bloodstream infections in Michigan intensive care units: observational study

    BMJ

    (2010)
  • D Moher et al.

    Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

    Ann Intern Med

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text