Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 345, Issue 8948, 25 February 1995, Pages 498-502
The Lancet

Clinical practice
Randomised controlled trial of routine individual feedback to improve rationality and reduce numbers of test requests

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90588-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Feedback can be described as a way to provide information on doctors' performance to enable changes in future behaviour. Feedback is used with the aim of changing test-ordering behaviour. It can lead to reductions in test usage and cost savings. It is not sufficiently clear, however, whether feedback leads to more appropriate test use. Since 1985, the Diagnostic Coordinating Center Maastricht has been giving feedback on diagnostic tests as a routine health care activity to all family doctors in its region. Both quantity and quality of requests are discussed. In a randomised, controlled trial over 2·5 years, discussion of tests not included previously was added to the existing routine feedback. One group of family doctors (n=39) received feedback on test-group A (electrocardiography, endoscopy, cervical smears, and allergy tests), the other (n=40) on test-group B (radiographic and ultrasonographic tests). Thus, each group of doctors acted as a control group for the other. Changes in volume and rationality of requests were analysed. The number of requests decreased during the trial (p=0·036). Request numbers decreased particularly for test-group A (p=0·04). The proportion of requests that were non-rational decreased more in the intervention than in the control groups (p=0·009). Rationality improved predominantly for test-group B (p=0·043). Thus, routine feedback can change the quantity and quality of requests.

References (19)

  • Fgr Fowkes et al.

    Multicentre trial of four strategies to reduce use of a radiological test

    Lancet

    (1986)
  • M. Mugford et al.

    Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review

    BMJ

    (1991)
  • F. Buntinx et al.

    Influencing diagnostic and preventive performance in ambulatory care by feedback and reminders: a review

    Family Pract

    (1993)
  • P. Axt-Adam et al.

    Influencing behaviour of physicians ordering laboratory tests: a literature study

    Med Care

    (1993)
  • Wm Tierney et al.

    The effect on test ordering of informing physicians of the charges for the outpatient diagnostic tests

    N Engl J Med

    (1990)
  • Ar Martin et al.

    A trial of two strategies to modify test-ordering behaviour of medical residents

    N Engl J Med

    (1980)
  • Dm Berwick et al.

    Feedback reduces test use in a Health Maintenance Organization

    JAMA

    (1986)
  • Ki Marton et al.

    Modifying test-ordering behaviour in the outpatient medical clinic; a controlled trial of two educational interventions

    Arch Intern Med

    (1985)
  • Wm Tierney et al.

    Computerized display of past test results: effect on outpatient testing

    Ann Intern Med

    (1987)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (73)

  • Developing implementation science to improve the translation of research to address low back pain: A critical review

    2016, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Rheumatology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Effect of intervention on implementation and individual patient outcomes Seventeen studies assessed implementation outcomes [28–30,33–36,38,39,41,42,46–51] and five studies assessed individual outcomes [28,29,32,37,38,49]. Only four studies assessed both implementation and individual-level outcomes [28,29,37,38,49].

  • Interventions to Educate Family Physicians to Change Test Ordering: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

    2016, Academic Pathology
    Citation Excerpt :

    There were 7 studies from each of the United States and the Netherlands, 5 from the United Kingdom, 3 from Canada, 2 each from Australia, Norway, and Belgium, and 1 from New Zealand. The studies that reported data included collectively 4111 physicians and 175 563 patients (2 studies did not report the number of physicians,34,35 and 8 studies did not report the number of patients,20,22,23,28–30,32–34,35 and those numbers were also not available in related papers). There were 20 studies36–55 in which outcomes for family physicians were not separable from those of other professional groups, and these were excluded from this review.

  • Translating Evidence into Practice: Use of Statins in Real-World Patients with Heart Failure

    2008, Heart Failure Clinics
    Citation Excerpt :

    The main components for improving use of statins in eligible patients include provider feedback, physician and patient educational interventions, and easy tools to facilitate standardization of care. Because clinicians tend to be competitive and success-driven, interventions providing performance feedback relative to peers can effectively motivate change [33,34]. However, provider feedback cannot be the only method because results differ depending on the study or actual feedback mechanism [35].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text