Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Interventions Designed to Reduce Medication Administration Errors in Hospitals: A Systematic Review

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is a need to identify effective interventions to minimize the threat posed by medication administration errors (MAEs).

Objective

Our objective was to review and critically appraise interventions designed to reduce MAEs in the hospital setting.

Data sources

Ten electronic databases were searched between 1985 and November 2013.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled trials (CTs) reporting rates of MAEs or related adverse drug events between an intervention group and a comparator group were included. Data from each study were independently extracted and assessed for potential risk of bias by two authors. Risk ratios (RRs, with 95 % confidence intervals [CIs]) were used to examine the effect of an intervention.

Results

Six RCTs and seven CTs were included. Types of interventions clustered around four main themes: medication use technology (n = 4); nurse education and training (n = 3); changing practice in anesthesia (n = 2); and ward system changes (n = 4). Reductions in MAE rates were reported by five studies; these included automated drug dispensing (RR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.53–1.00), computerized physician order entry (RR 0.51, 95 % 0.40–0.66), barcode-assisted medication administration with electronic administration records (RR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.53–0.95), nursing education/training using simulation (RR 0.17, 95 % CI 0.08–0.38), and clinical pharmacist-led training (RR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.67–0.87). Increased or equivocal outcome rates were found for the remaining studies. Weaknesses in the internal or external validity were apparent for most included studies.

Limitations

Theses and conference proceedings were excluded and data produced outside commercial publishing were not searched.

Conclusions

There is emerging evidence of the impact of specific interventions to reduce MAEs in hospitals, which warrant further investigation using rigorous and standardized study designs. Theory-driven efforts to understand the underlying causes of MAEs may lead to more effective interventions in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, et al. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(3):216–23.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanjanarat P, Winterstein AG, Johns TE, et al. Nature of preventable adverse drug events in hospitals: a literature review. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003;60(17):1750–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morimoto T, Gandhi TK, Seger AC, et al. Adverse drug events and medication errors: detection and classification methods. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(4):306–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carayon P, Wetterneck TB, Cartmill R, et al. Characterising the complexity of medication safety using a human factors approach: an observational study in two intensive care units. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(1):56–65.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Keers RN, Williams SD, Cooke J, et al. Prevalence and nature of medication administration errors in health care settings: a systematic review of direct observational evidence. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47(2):237–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McLeod MC, Barber N, Franklin BD. Methodological variations and their effects on reported medication administration error rates. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(4):278–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ross S, Ryan C, Duncan EM, et al. Perceived causes of prescribing errors by junior doctors in hospital inpatients: a study from the PROTECT programme. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(2):97–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Keers RN, Williams SD, Cooke J, et al. Causes of medication administration errors in hospitals: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Drug Saf. 2013;36(11):1045–67.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tully MP, Ashcroft DM, Dornan T, et al. The causes of and factors associated with prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2009;32(10):819–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dornan T, Ashcroft DM, Heathfield H, et al. An in-depth investigation into causes of prescribing errors by foundation trainees in relation to their medical education. EQUIP study; 2009. http://www.gmc-uk.org/FINAL_Report_prevalence_and_causes_of_prescribing_errors.pdf_28935150.pdf. Last Accessed Sep 2013.

  11. Aspden P, Wolcott JA, Bootman LJ, et al., editors. Preventing medication errors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007. p. 409–19.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith J. Building a safer NHS for patients: improving medication safety. London: The Stationary Office; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wulff K, Cummings GG, Marck P, et al. Medication administration technologies and patient safety: a mixed-method systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(10):2080–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Raban MZ, Westbrook JI. Are interventions to reduce interruptions and errors during medication administration effective? A systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002118.

  15. Alsulami Z, Conroy S, Choonara I. Double checking the administration of medicines: what is the evidence? A systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(9):833–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hodgkinson B, Koch S, Nay R, et al. Strategies to reduce medication errors with reference to older adults. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2006;4(1):2–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manias E, Williams A, Liew D. Interventions to reduce medication errors in adult intensive care: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;74(3):411–23.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ammenwerth E, Schnell-Inderst P, Machan C, et al. The effect of electronic prescribing on medication errors and adverse drug events: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(5):585–600.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(12):1409–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organistion of Care Group. What study designs should be included in an EPOC review and what should they be called? http://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/uploads/EPOC%20Study%20Designs%20About.pdf. Last Accessed Sep 2013.

  21. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dean AG, Sullivan KM, Soe MM. OpenEpi: open source epidemiologic statistics for public health, version 3.01. http://www.openepi.com. Last Accessed Sep 2013.

  23. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group. Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. http://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/uploads/14%20Suggested%20risk%20of%20bias%20criteria%20for%20EPOC%20reviews%202013%2008%2012.pdf. Last Accessed Sep 2013.

  24. Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998;280(15):1311–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Greengold NL, Shane R, Schneider P, et al. The impact of dedicated medication nurses on the medication administration error rate: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(19):2359–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schneider PJ, Pedersen CA, Montanya KR, et al. Improving the safety of medication administration using an interactive CD-ROM program. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006;63(1):59–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Paoletti RD, Suess TM, Lesko MG, et al. Using bar-code technology and medication observation methodology for safer medication administration. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64(5):536–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ford DG, Seybert AL, Smithburger PL, et al. Impact of simulation-based learning on medication error rates in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(9):1526–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rothschild JM, Keohane CA, Cook EF, et al. A controlled trial of smart infusion pumps to improve medication safety in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(3):533–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Webster CS, Larsson L, Frampton CM, et al. Clinical assessment of a new anaesthetic drug administration system: a prospective, controlled, longitudinal incident monitoring study. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(5):490–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Merry AF, Webster CS, Hannam J, et al. Multimodal system designed to reduce errors in recording and administration of drugs in anaesthesia: prospective randomised clinical evaluation. BMJ. 2011;343:d5543.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chapuis C, Roustit M, Bal G, et al. Automated drug dispensing system reduces medication errors in an intensive care setting. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(12):2275–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dean B, Barber N. The effects of a patients’ own drugs scheme on the incidence and severity of medication administration errors. Int J Pharm Pract. 2000;8(3):209–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. King WJ, Paice N, Rangrej J, et al. The effect of computerized physician order entry on medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. Pediatrics. 2003;112(3 Pt 1):506–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kruse H, Johnson A, O’Connell D, et al. Administering non-restricted medications in hospital: the implications and cost of using two nurses. Aust Clin Rev. 1992;12(2):77–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nguyen HT, Pham HT, Vo DK, et al. The effect of a clinical pharmacist-led training programme on intravenous medication errors: a controlled before and after study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:319–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tissot E, Cornette C, Demoly P, et al. Medication errors at the administration stage in an intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25(4):353–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995;274(1):29–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Barker KN, Flynn EA, Pepper GA, et al. Medication errors observed in 36 health care facilities. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(16):1897–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Santell JP, Hicks RW, McMeekin J, et al. Medication errors: experience of the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) MEDMARX reporting system. J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;43(7):760–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Barker KN, McConnell WE. How to detect medication errors. Mod Hosp. 1962;99:95–106.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Taxis K, Barber N. Incidence and severity of intravenous drug errors in a German hospital. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;59(11):815–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chua SS, Tea MH, Rahman MH. An observational study of drug administration errors in a Malaysian hospital (study of drug administration errors). J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009;34(2):215–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Allan EL, Barker KN. Fundamentals of medication error research. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990;47(3):555–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Royal S, Smeaton L, Avery AJ, et al. Interventions in primary care to reduce medication related adverse events and hospital admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(1):23–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Poon EG, Keohane CA, Yoon CS, et al. Effect of bar-code technology on the safety of medication administration. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(18):1698–707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pintor-Mármol A, Baena MI, Fajardo PC, et al. Terms used in patient safety related to medication: a literature review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(8):799–809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Meyer-Massetti C, Cheng CM, Schwappach DL, et al. Systematic review of medication safety assessment methods. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011;68(3):227–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Flynn EA, Barker KN, Pepper GA, et al. Comparison of methods for detecting medication errors in 36 hospitals and skilled-nursing facilities. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002;59(5):436–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Dean B, Barber N. Validity and reliability of observational methods for studying medication administration errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2001;58(1):54–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Jha AK, Kuperman GJ, Teich JM, et al. Identifying adverse drug events: development of a computer-based monitor and comparison with chart review and stimulated voluntary report. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(3):305–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Olsen S, Neale G, Schwab K, et al. Hospital staff should use more than one method to detect adverse events and potential adverse events: incident reporting, pharmacist surveillance and local real-time record review may all have a place. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16(1):40–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Koppel R, Wetterneck T, Telles JL, et al. Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(4):408–23.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Cresswell KM, Bates DW, Sheikh A. Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(e1):e9–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Brown C, Hofer T, Johal A, et al. An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 3. End points and measurement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(3):170–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Maviglia SM, Yoo JY, Franz C, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of a hospital pharmacy bar code solution. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(8):788–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kaushal R, Jha AK, Franz C, et al. Return on investment for a computerized physician order entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(3):261–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Sakowski JA, Ketchel A. The cost of implementing inpatient bar code medication administration. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19(2):e38–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Dixon-Woods M, McNicol S, Martin G. Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation’s programme evaluations and relevant literature. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(10):876–84.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Brown C, Hofer T, Johal A, et al. An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 2. Study design. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(3):163–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Colligan L, Bass EJ. Interruption handling strategies during paediatric medication administration. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(11):912–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Colligan L, Guerlain S, Steck SE, et al. Designing for distractions: a human factors approach to decreasing interruptions at a centralised medication station. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(11):939–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Tromp M, Natsch S, van Achterberg T. The preparation and administration of intravenous drugs before and after protocol implementation. Pharm World Sci. 2009;31(3):413–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kane-Gill SL, Jacobi J, Rothschild JM. Adverse drug events in intensive care units: risk factors, impact, and the role of team care. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(6 Suppl):S83–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Brown C, Hofer T, Johal A, et al. An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 1. Conceptualising and developing interventions. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(3):158–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Richard N. Keers gratefully acknowledges funding to support his PhD training provided by the University of Manchester and University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust (UK), which was used to conduct this study (grant number FA02004). Richard would like to thank Ruth Silman for her advice during the development of the search strategy. Richard Keers, Steven Williams, Jonathon Cooke, Tanya Walsh, and Darren Ashcroft have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard N. Keers.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Electronic Supplementary Material: Complete search strategy for EMBASE

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keers, R.N., Williams, S.D., Cooke, J. et al. Impact of Interventions Designed to Reduce Medication Administration Errors in Hospitals: A Systematic Review. Drug Saf 37, 317–332 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0152-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0152-0

Keywords

Navigation