Skip to main content
Log in

Adequacy of Hospital Discharge Summaries in Documenting Tests with Pending Results and Outpatient Follow-up Providers

  • Hospital Medicine
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Poor communication of tests whose results are pending at hospital discharge can lead to medical errors.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the adequacy with which hospital discharge summaries document tests with pending results and the appropriate follow-up providers.

DESIGN

Retrospective study of a randomly selected sample

PATIENTS

Six hundred ninety-six patients discharged from two large academic medical centers, who had test results identified as pending at discharge through queries of electronic medical records.

INTERVENTION AND MEASUREMENTS

Each patient’s discharge summary was reviewed to identify whether information about pending tests and follow-up providers was mentioned. Factors associated with documentation were explored using clustered multivariable regression models.

MAIN RESULTS

Discharge summaries were available for 99.2% of 668 patients whose data were analyzed. These summaries mentioned only 16% of tests with pending results (482 of 2,927). Even though all study patients had tests with pending results, only 25% of discharge summaries mentioned any pending tests, with 13% documenting all pending tests. The documentation rate for pending tests was not associated with level of experience of the provider preparing the summary, patient’s age or race, length of hospitalization, or duration it took for results to return. Follow-up providers’ information was documented in 67% of summaries.

CONCLUSION

Discharge summaries are grossly inadequate at documenting both tests with pending results and the appropriate follow-up providers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, et al. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(2):121–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Solet DJ, Norvell JM, Rutan GH, Frankel RM. Lost in translation: challenges and opportunities in physician-to-physician communication during patient handoffs. Acad Med. 2005;80(12):1094–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):161–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, Harrison BT, Hamilton JD. Quality in Australian health care study. Med J Aust. 1996;164(12):754.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kosecoff J, Kahn KL, Rogers WH, et al. Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge. The ‘quicker-and-sicker’ story revisited. JAMA. 1990;264(15):1980–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McMahon LF Jr. The hospitalist movement-time to move on. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(25):2627–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. van Walraven C, Seth R, Austin PC, Laupacis A. Effect of discharge summary availability during post-discharge visits on hospital readmission. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(3):186–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. IM.6.10. S. Hospital Accreditation Standards: Joint Commission Resources. Oakbrook Terrace, IL; 2006.

  9. Halasyamani L, Kripalani S, Coleman E, et al. Transition of care for hospitalized elderly patients-development of a discharge checklist for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2006;1(6):354–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson S, Ruscoe W, Chapman M, Miller R. General practitioner-hospital communications: a review of discharge summaries. J Qual Clin Pract. 2001;21(4):104–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Foster DS, Paterson C, Fairfield G. Evaluation of immediate discharge documents-room for improvement? Scott Med J. 2002;47(4):77–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moore C, Wisnivesky J, Williams S, McGinn T. Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(8):646–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McDonald CJ, Overhage JM, Barnes M, et al. The Indiana network for patient care: a working local health information infrastructure. An example of a working infrastructure collaboration that links data from five health systems and hundreds of millions of entries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1214–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was performed at Regenstrief Institute and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, and was supported by grant LM07117-11 from NLM and KL2RR025760-01 from NCRR. The authors appreciate the support of Drs. Marc Overhage, William M. Tierney and IUSM EIP-REACH.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin C. Were MD MS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Were, M.C., Li, X., Kesterson, J. et al. Adequacy of Hospital Discharge Summaries in Documenting Tests with Pending Results and Outpatient Follow-up Providers. J GEN INTERN MED 24, 1002–1006 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1057-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1057-y

KEY WORDS

Navigation