Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Employing the Electronic Health Record to Improve Diabetes Care: A Multifaceted Intervention in an Integrated Delivery System

  • Innovations in Clinical Practice
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes is one of the nation’s most prevalent chronic diseases. Although well-known practice guidelines exist, real-life clinical performance often falls short of benchmarks.

AIM

Employ an electronic registry derived from a fully integrated electronic health record (EHR) as the cornerstone of an intervention to improve compliance with recommended diabetes performance measures in an integrated practice network.

SETTING

Geisinger Health System’s network of 38 practice sites providing care to over 20,000 persons with diabetes located in a 40-county region of central and northeastern Pennsylvania.

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

A multidisciplinary group of physicians worked to create a “bundle” of best practice measures for diabetes. This measurement tool was then used as part of a multifaceted intervention to improve physician performance in diabetes care, including audit and feedback, computerized reminders, and financial incentives. Changes in performance of individual measures and the total “bundle” were tracked monthly over 1 year.

PROGRAM EVALUATION

Significant increases were seen in all measures of diabetes care over the 12-month period of the study. Vaccination for pneumococcal disease and influenza improved from 56.5% to 80.8% (p < .0001) and 55.1% to 71.0% (p < .0001), respectively. The percentage of patients with ideal glucose control (HBA1c < 7.0) increased from 32.2% to 34.8% (p < .001), and blood pressure control (<130/80) improved from 39.7% to 43.9% (p < .0001). The overall number of patients receiving all 9 “bundled” measurements improved from 2.4% to 6.5% (p < .0001).

DISCUSSION

Diabetes care improved significantly in response to a multifaceted intervention featuring the use of an EHR-derived registry in an integrated delivery system. More work is needed to demonstrate that such improvements will translate into improved patient health outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2007. Diabetes Care 2007;30(Suppl 1):S4–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Burcack RC. Barriers to clinical preventive medicine. Prim Care 1989;16:245–50.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yarnall KSH, Pollack KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93:635–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mandelblatt J, Kanetsky PA. Effectiveness of interventions to enhance physician screening for breast cancer. J Fam Pract 1995;40:162–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gill JM, Ewen E, Nsereko M. Impact of an electronic medical record on quality of care in a primary care office. Del Med J. 2001;73(5):187–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:S4–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nolan T, Berwick D. All-or-none measurement raises the bar on performance. JAMA 2006;295(10):1168–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2004 National Healthcare Quality Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Series; 2004. AHRQ Publication 05-0013.

  9. Amundsen G, Werhle D. HealthPartners: 2005–6 Clinical Indicators Report. http://www.healthpartners.com/files/34613.pdf. Accessed April 20, 2007.

  10. Minnesota Community Measurement 2006 Healthcare Quality Report. April 2007. http://www.mnhealthcare.org/Report/. Accessed April 19, 2007.

  11. Solomon DH, Hashimoto H, Daltroy L, Liang MH. Techniques to improve physicians’ uses of diagnostic tests: a new conceptual framework. JAMA 1998;280(23):2020–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Durso SC. Using clinical guidelines designed for older adults with diabetes mellitus and complex health status. JAMA 2006;295(16):1935–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Sandra Buckley for her editorial assistance and Dr. Mark Selna for his contributions and coordination of the implementation of the project.

Conflicts of interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valerie Weber MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weber, V., Bloom, F., Pierdon, S. et al. Employing the Electronic Health Record to Improve Diabetes Care: A Multifaceted Intervention in an Integrated Delivery System. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 379–382 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0439-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0439-2

KEY WORDS

Navigation