Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Electronic Signature on Radiology Report Turnaround Time

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of electronic signature on report turnaround time. The Radiology Information System (RIS) database was interrogated to obtain a file containing all examinations recorded within a one-month period. Two sectors were specifically studied: abdominal ultrasound and chest radiography. Each of these sectors had one reader per day. The periods studied were October 2001 (before implementation of electronic signature) and February 2002 (3 months after electronic signature implementation). For the abdominal ultrasound examinations, the median time from transcription to final signature decreased from 11 days to 3 days with the introduction of electronic signature (P < 0.001). For the chest radiographs, the median time from transcription to final signature decreased from 10 days to 5 days with the introduction of electronic signature (P < 0.001). Electronic signature significantly shortens the time interval between transcription and finalization of radiology reports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BI Reiner EL Siegel FJ Hooper et al. (1998) ArticleTitleEffect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists. Radiology 207 481–485 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3jvVemuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9577498

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. A Mehta K Dreyer G Boland et al. (2000) ArticleTitleDo picture archiving and communication systems improve report turnaround times? J Digit Imaging 13 IssueIDSuppl 1 105–107 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvotVOitw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10847375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. SG Langer (2002) ArticleTitleImpact of speech recognition on radiologist productivity. J Digit Imaging 15 203–209 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10278-002-0014-7 Occurrence Handle12415463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. CW Mattern BF King Jr NJ Hangiandreou et al. (1999) ArticleTitleElectronic imaging impact on image and report turnaround times. J Digit Imaging 12 IssueIDSuppl 1 155–159 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ntlOntg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10342198

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. JP Crabbe CL Frank WW Nye (1994) ArticleTitleImproving report turnaround time: an integrated method using data from a radiology information system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163 IssueID6 1503–1507

    Google Scholar 

  6. MS Frank AH Rowberg (1993) ArticleTitleAuthentication and management of radiologic reports: value of a computer workstation integrated with a radiology information system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161 1309–1311

    Google Scholar 

  7. E Seltzer P Kelly DF Adams et al. (1997) ArticleTitleExpediting the turnaround of radiology reports in a teaching hospital setting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168 889–893

    Google Scholar 

  8. B Gale Y Safriel A Lukban et al. (2001) ArticleTitleRadiology report production times: voice recognition vs. transcription. Radiol Manage 23 18–22 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3oslaluw%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Lepanto M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lepanto, L. Impact of Electronic Signature on Radiology Report Turnaround Time. J Digit Imaging 16, 306–309 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-003-1730-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-003-1730-3

Keywords

Navigation