Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical unit time utilization review: Resource utilization and management implications

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As health care providers seek ways to reduce the cost of health care services, hospital operating rooms (ORs) have been identified as potential areas for cost reduction efforts. Cost containment efforts which have shifted significant portions of the inpatient population to ambulatory areas have resulted in an inpatient population which is sicker and more procedure-intensive. Efficient management of operating rooms has assumed even greater importance in this environment. Inefficient or inaccurate scheduling of OR time often results in delays of surgery or cancellations of procedures, which are costly to the patient and the hospital. Approaches to efficient use of ORs include computerized scheduling, utilization monitoring, and refinement of scheduling policies and procedures. In the absence of commercially avaiable software to meet operating room management information needs, Johns Hopkins developed its own system in 1983. This software provides detailed information for daily OR management and long-term planning. The computerized operating room scheduling and monitoring system is described in this article and an operational measure of scheduling accuracy is proposed. Suggestions are made for incorporating this measure into planning and allocation decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American College of Surgeons,Socio-Economic Fact Book for Surgery, James N. Haug and Pam E. Politser (Eds.), American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnoon, S., and Wolfe, H., Scheduling a multiple operating room system: A simulation approach.Health Serv. Res. 3(4):272–285, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kuzdrall, P.J., Kwak, N.K., and Schmitz, H.H., The Monte Carlo simulation of operating room and recovery-room usage.Operat. Res. 22(2):434–440, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schmitz, H.H., and Kwak, N.K., Monte Carlo simulation of operating-room and recovery-room usage.Operat. Res. 20(3):1171–1180, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldman, J., Knappenberger, H.A., and Moore, Jr., E.W., An evaluation of operating room scheduling policies.Hosp. Manag. 107(4):40–51, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ernst, E.A., Hoppel, C.L., Lorig, J.L., and Danielson, R.A., Operating room scheduling by computer.Anesth. Analg. 56:831–835, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  7. O'Donnell, D.J., Theatre utilization analysis.Med. J. Aust. 2:650–651, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richel, W., and Sajda, L., Performance factor developed as surgical suite management tool.Hospitals 51(6):146–152, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moll, D.B., Lande, M.A., and Buckley, J.J., O.R. information system implemented.Hospitals 49(1):55–58, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Francis, L., An imporved method for posting surgery.AORN J. 32(3):489–494, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Curtis, R.S., and Scott, E.J., Alternative scheduling for OR personnel results in more surgeries, less overtime.Hospitals 56(22):48–52, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hackey, B.A., Casey, K.L., and Narasimhan, S.L., Maximizing resources: Efficient scheduling of the OR.AORN J. 39(7):1174–1180, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Drier, C.A., Van Winkle, R.N., and Wetchler, B.V., Ambulatory surgery: Block scheduling contributes to ambulatory surgery center success.AORN J. 39(4):673–674, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McColligan, E.E., Gordon, T.A., Jones, C.E., Stiff, J.L., Donham, R.T., and Rogers, M.C., Automated utilization analysis as a foundation for effective operating room management.Eighth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care (SCAMC), Washington, D.C., November 4–7, 1984.

  15. Ernst, E.A.,et al., op cit.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hanson, K.H., Computer assisted operating room scheduling.J. Med. Syst. 6(3):311–314, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kelly, M.G., Eastham, A., and Bowling, G.S., Efficient OR scheduling: A study to decrease cancellations.AORN J. 41(3):565–567, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McColligan, E.E.,et al., op cit.

  19. Martin, J.B., Smith, R.F., Radoyevich, M., and Fichman, R.G., Surgically related applications of computerized operating room data.Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 160(1):17–19, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brown, A.C.D., Computer management of operating room time information with proposed standard definitions for the measurement of utilization.SCAMC IEEE 0195-4210/82/000/02446, 1982.

  21. Helsel, P., Smith, R.B., and Albin, M., Computerized operating room information system.SCAMC IEEE 0195-4210/83/0000/0296, 1982.

  22. White, A., Examining activity in operating theatres.Hops. Health Serv. Rev. 80(1):15–20, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nathanson, M., Computer-aided scheduling can put scalpel to costs of operating room.Mod. Healthcare 14(6):44–46, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McColligan, E.E.,et al., op cit.

  25. Gordon, T.A., Fountain, J., and Lindenmeyer, K., Computerized operating room scheduling and utilization analysis: Three years of experience in a teaching hospital setting. Presented atComputers in Anesthesia VII, Grand Canyon, Arizona, October 21–24, 1986.

  26. Tolchin, S.G., Barta, W., and Harkness, K., The Johns Hopkins Hospital Network.SCAMC IEEE 0105-4210/85/0000/0732, 1985.

  27. American College of Surgeons, op. cit.,James N. Haug andPam E. Politser (Eds.),American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, 1987

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gordon, T., Paul, S., Lyles, A. et al. Surgical unit time utilization review: Resource utilization and management implications. J Med Syst 12, 169–179 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00996639

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00996639

Keywords

Navigation