Findings 3 years after the implementation of the GC method
| Theme | Category | Subcategory |
| Still active, but in need of revitalisation | Continuing to facilitate open communication | Contribution to increased information about the patient safety incidents |
| Focus on improving the system | ||
| Expressing a desire for more interprofessional collaboration regarding improvements | Joint quality improvement meetings increase shared understanding | |
| A challenging collaboration among the healthcare professionals regarding the quality improvement work across units | ||
| An untapped potential in the collaboration with the anaesthesiologists | ||
| Increasing reluctance to report | Reduced motivation due to inadequate quality improvements in and outside the PACU | |
| Not all incidents need to be reported | ||
| Downscaling due to the pandemic | Insufficient time | |
| Extremely exhausted | ||
| Avoiding worsening the matters | ||
| Expressing a desire to share more of what went well | Greater focus on excellent work | |
| Learning from what went well may improve patient safety |
PACU, postanaesthesia care unit.