Outcomes and measures that participants provided to monitor implementation success
| Outcomes | Measures (n=16) | |
| Main categories | Subcategories | Sub-subcategories |
| QUANTITATIVE (n=10) | ||
| Visibility (n=6) | Number of publications and feedback* (n=2) | / |
| Utilisation (n=37) | Reporting rate (n=18) | Trend of reporting rates (n=5) |
| Critical reference values: <5 reports/week; <150 reports/2 years; minimum 1 report/month (n=3) | ||
| Reporting (rate) by professional groups, units (n=17) | ||
| Reporting rate by organisational units (n=1) | ||
| Relative reporting rate in relation to number of patients (n=1) | / | |
| Reporting rate not further defined (n=5) | / | |
| Adoption (n=10)* | / | |
| Fidelity (n=1) | Correct report type following definition (n=7) | / |
| Penetration (n=2)* | / | / |
| Sustainability (n=1) | Progression of trust | |
| QUALITATIVE (n=6) | ||
| Visibility (n=6) | RLS responsible nomination (n=3) | / |
| RLS integration in IT structure (n=2) | / | |
| Outcome not further defined (n=12) | Feedback, check back regarding RLS (n=8) | / |
| Deduced interventions (n=5) | / | |
| Realised RLS training and knowledge (n=4) | / | |
| Quality of reports, eg, relevance (n=4) | / | |
| Awareness (n=5)* | / | / |
| Acceptance (n=2)* | / | / |
*Outcome not further specified by a measure.
RLS, reporting and learning system.