Table 4

Scores on the barriers and facilitators (feasibility) questionnaire (n=50)

Mean (SD)
Determinants of innovation3.45 (0.95)
The tracer communication with the patient clearly indicates which activities I have to perform in which order3.28 (0.97)
The tracer communication with the patient is based on actually correct knowledge3.10 (0.81)
The tracer communication with the patient offers all the information needed to work well with2.88 (0.99)
Application of the tracer communication with the patient is easy to understand for me3.45 (0.87)
The tracer communication with the patient is a good fit with how I am used doing my work3.22 (1.09)
I think the effects of using the tracer communication with the patient are clearly visible3.10 (1.01)
I think the tracer communication with the patient is suitable for my colleagues3.24 (1.16)
Application of the tracer communication with the patient helps to improve my quality of communication with the patient3.56 (0.99)
I think it is important that my quality of communication with the patient improves4.10 (0.84)
I think it is part of my job as a hospital-based physiotherapist to perform the tracer communication with the patient3.58 (0.93)
Patients benefit from the usage of the tracer communication with the patient3.46 (1.01)
Colleague hospital-based physiotherapists will generally cooperate when the tracer communication with the patient is applied3.52 (0.65)
I can rely on sufficient support from my management/supervisor when using the tracer communication with the patient3.88 (0.72)
I have sufficient knowledge to be able to carry out the tracer communication with the patient3.90 (0,54)
The activities in the tracer communication with the patient fit with the existing KNGF guidelines3.38 (0.67)
Probability to use3.47 (0.86)
I am satisfied with the tracer communication with the patient3.14 (0.88)
I intend to use this system of tracer communication with the patient more often3.06 (0.87)
This tracer communication with the patient is suitable for use in daily practice3.26 (1.05)
The tracer communication with the patient fits within our organisation3.46 (0.93)
I experience a positive effect of this tracer communication with the patient3.68 (0.68)
This method of tracer communication with the patient meets a need3.30 (0.76)
This method of tracer communication with the patient can be learnt quickly3.90 (0.62)
I felt competent enough to perform this tracer communication with the patient4.00 (0.53)
User feedback list during tracer2.63 (1.07)
I think the feedback list quality of communication with the patient is particularly useful2.70 (1.11)
The questions in the feedback list quality of communication with the patient were all relevant2.38 (1.03)
The feedback list quality of communication with the patient is a powerful feedback tool2.80 (1.05)
  • KNGF, Royal Dutch Society for Physiotherapy.