Differences in questionnaire results between trauma systems via Likert scale averages
| TIGER n=25 (mean, SD) | eTrauma (1 month) n=25 (mean, SD) | eTrauma (4 month) n=25 (mean, SD) | |
| Question | |||
| 1. The trauma meeting follows a structured format each day | 7.7 (2.1) | 6.7 (2.2) | 7.5 (1.5) |
| 2. The order of patients for the trauma list on that day is made clear and apparent | 6.1 (2.5) | 6.4 (2.0) | 6.3 (1.9) |
| 3. It is clear for the anaesthetic team to know which patients need to be seen and with what urgency they need to be seen | 6.2 (2.7) | 6.6 (2.1) | 7.0 (2.0) |
| 4. The operation decided for each patient is clearly communicated | 6.7 (2.6) | 7.6 (2.1) | 7.4 (1.8) |
| 5. The operation decided for each patient is clearly documented | 5.5 (3.1) | 6.5 (1.7) | 7.5 (1.4) |
| 6. The plan for new referrals is clear | 7.1 (2.0) | 7.4 (1.5) | 7.3 (1.3) |
| 7. The plan for new referrals is documented | 6.0 (2.6) | 6.5 (2.0) | 7.1 (1.8) |
| 8. Any chances to management plan/list order are clearly communicated | 6.0 (2.7) | 6.3 (2.1) | 7.0 (1.2) |
1–10 Likert scale. 1 = strongly disagree. 10 = strongly agree.