Agree/strongly agree | ||||
2.5 months (n=28) | 5 months (n=39) | 10 months (n=31) | ||
A | I have enjoyed the team-based discussions | 89% | 92% | 90% |
B | I like the process of reviewing the standards using the map-based graphical representations in the MEERQAT tool | 79% | 82% | 84% |
C | I have enjoyed the opportunity to reflect on my own clinical practice | 89% | 95% | 94% |
D | I have felt comfortable expressing my views and opinions in the team-based discussions | 93% | 92% | 87% |
E | I have found hearing the different perspectives among my colleagues to be worthwhile | 96% | 100% | 97% |
F | I have learnt new information about the national quality standards | 86% | 95% | 97% |
G | I have learnt new information about specific Epworth policies and protocols | 82% | 97% | 97% |
H | I have volunteered to assist with some of the specific improvement actions identified in the project (I was involved in QI activities in the 12 months before the project commenced) | 57% (25%) | 53% (29%) | 61% (16%) |
Somewhat/greatly increased | ||||
2.5 months (n=29) | 5 months (n=39) | 10 months (n=32) | ||
I | How would you compare your level of interest in quality issues and quality improvement now to before your first MEERQAT session? | 72% | 87% | 84% |
‘Yes’ | ||||
Since the project commenced… | 2.5 months (n=30) | 5 months (n=41) | 10 months (n=32) | |
J | Staff within my ward/unit are generally more aware of quality | 67% | 80% | 91% |
K | There are more informal discussions about the quality standards in our ward/unit | 67% | 66% | 81% |
L | There have been some notable improvements in practice among all staff in our ward/unit | 41% | 68% | 88% |
MEER, map-enabled experiential review; QI, quality improvement.