Does SNAAP process change staffing resources required for accreditation preparation?
| Question | Major decrease | Minor decrease | About the same | Minor increase | Major increase | |
| What effect has the SNAAP model had on the extent of staff resources required for accreditation administration and preparation? | Follow-up questionnaire 1 (n=28) | 36% (10/28) | 39% (11/28) | 21% (6/28) | 4% (1/28) | − (0/28) |
| Follow-up questionnaire 2 (n=36) | 31% (11/36) | 25% (9/36) | 39% (14/36) | 6% (2/36) | − (0/36) | |
| To what extent did the change in resourcing required for SNAAP enable the organisation to provide resourcing elsewhere? | Follow-up questionnaire 1 (n=12) | − (0/12) | − (0/12) | 25% (3/12) | 33% (4/12) | 42% (5/12) |
| Follow-up questionnaire 2 (n=16) | − (0/16) | − (0/16) | 31% (5/16) | 31% (6/16) | 44% (6/16) | |
| Question | No impact | Slight impact | Moderate impact | High impact | Extreme impact | |
| To what extent does the current accreditation process impact negatively on your ability to perform your other responsibilities at the HHS? | Baseline (n=42) | 5% (2/42) | 5% (2/42) | 12% (5/42) | 64% (27/42) | 14% (6/42) |
| Follow-up questionnaire 1 (n=25) | 4% (1/25) | 4% (1/25) | − (0/25) | 48% (12/25) | 44% (11/25) | |
| Follow-up questionnaire 2 (n=31) | −(0/31) | −(0/31) | 16% (5/31) | 65% (20/31) | 19% (6/31) |
HHS, hospital and health system; SNAAP, Short-Notice Accreditation Assessment Process.