@article {Lindsaye000074, author = {Alistair C Lindsay and Jeremy Bishop and Katie Harron and Simon Davies and Elizabeth Haxby}, title = {Use of a safe procedure checklist in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory}, volume = {7}, number = {3}, elocation-id = {e000074}, year = {2018}, doi = {10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000074}, publisher = {BMJ Open Quality}, abstract = {Background The use of the WHO safe surgery checklist has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality from surgical procedures. However, whether a WHO-style safe procedure checklist can improve safety in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory (CCL) has not previously been investigated.Objectives The authors sought to design and implement a safe procedure checklist suitable for all CCL procedures, and to assess its impact over the course of 1 year.Methods In the first 3 months, weekly PDSA cycles (Plan-Do-Study-Act) were used to optimise the design of the checklist through testing and staff feedback, and team briefing sessions were introduced before each procedure list. The impact of the checklist and team briefs was assessed by analysing in-house procedural data subsequently submitted to national audit databases. Staff and patient questionnaires were performed throughout the year.Results Introduction of the checklist was associated with a significant reduction of 3 min in average turnaround time (95\% CI 25 s to 6 min, p=0.027). Similarly, an initial reduction in patient radiation exposure was recorded (dose area product reduction of 641.5 cGy/cm2; 95\% CI 255.9 to 1027.1, p=0.002). The rate of reported complications from all procedures fell significantly from 2.0\% in 2012/2013 (95\% CI 1.6\% to 2.4\%) to 0.8\% in 2013/2014 (95\% CI 0.6\% to 1.1\%, p<=0.001). Staff climate questionnaires showed that technicians and radiographers gave more positive responses at the end of the study period compared with the beginning (p=0.001).Conclusions The use of a team brief and WHO-derived safe procedure checklist in the CCL was associated with decreased radiation exposure, fewer procedural complications, faster turnarounds and improved staff experience.}, URL = {https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/7/3/e000074}, eprint = {https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/7/3/e000074.full.pdf}, journal = {BMJ Open Quality} }