@article {Shafeiu203119.w1429, author = {Rachelle Shafei}, title = {Better training, Better care: Medical Procedures Training Initiative}, volume = {2}, number = {2}, elocation-id = {u203119.w1429}, year = {2014}, doi = {10.1136/bmjquality.u203119.w1429}, publisher = {BMJ Open Quality}, abstract = {Training in procedures has been identified as the top priority for core medical trainees (GMC trainee survey 2011). Current practice relies on each trainee being lucky enough to encounter each procedure during clinical rotations and during on-calls. Where trainees are not lucky enough, they are entering their registrar years without the skills to efficiently lead the medical {\textquoteleft}on-take{\textquoteright}.(1) This can lead to delays in patient diagnosis or treatment. Because a single delay can easily burgeon into a lengthy series of multiple delays, this can lead to an associated prolongation of patient stay.(3) Both confidence and competence in practical procedures can be increased with a procedure bleep system. A dedicated procedure bleep, carried on a rotational basis alerts the bleep holder when a medical procedure is planned. The bleep holder then attends to observe, assist, perform, or teach the relevant procedure. This scheme shares the opportunities for procedure exposure amongst all trainees and ensures that a good breadth of experience has been gained independent of current placement. Formal evaluation revealed that 95\% (19/20) of junior trainees felt more confident and competent as a result of participation. Furthermore, consultants felt this initiative reduced the burden on the medical registrars on-call. By ensuring our diagnostic and therapeutic interventions are conducted efficiently, we are actively reducing length of hospital stay and improving the standard of healthcare provided.}, URL = {https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/2/2/u203119.w1429}, eprint = {https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/2/2/u203119.w1429.full.pdf}, journal = {BMJ Open Quality} }