PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Sharryn Gardner AU - Dominic Bray TI - Compassionate Conversations AID - 10.1136/bmjquality.u204059.w2102 DP - 2014 Jan 01 TA - BMJ Quality Improvement Reports PG - u204059.w2102 VI - 3 IP - 1 4099 - http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/3/1/u204059.w2102.short 4100 - http://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/3/1/u204059.w2102.full SO - BMJ Qual Improv Report2014 Jan 01; 3 AB - Staff engagement is much more than just a bonus in any organisation. CQC data shows that it is very clearly linked to positive results in both patient and staff outcomes (fewer complaints, improved safety, reduced sickness, fewer accidents, and more as per Michael West). Staff engagement may seem nebulous but is in fact measured routinely annually in the National Staff Survey. The problem is that often Trust Boards with poor Staff Survey results may struggle to increase staff engagement as staff see management initiatives as 'management fads' or 'tick-box exercises' purely for targets, not their own benefit. Compassionate Conversations are a ground-level initiative focused primarily on supporting and motivating individual staff as the primary focus. This allows the benefits to patients and in Human Resources to be an unspoken anticipated benefit. They are led by a Psychologist and Consultant in a coaching supportive atmosphere in an open or selected group. The Conversations have been rated 9/10 or higher by 64% of participants, while 75% of all participants voluntarily provided feedback. Feedback initially was that Conversations were too clinically-focused and further Conversations were more wide-ranging in topic and included departmental roadshows.