Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Understanding quality systems in the South African prehospital emergency medical services: a multiple exploratory case study
  1. Ian Howard1,2,
  2. Peter Cameron3,
  3. Lee Wallis2,4,
  4. Maaret Castrén5,
  5. Veronica Lindström6
  1. 1 Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  2. 2 Division of Emergency Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa
  3. 3 Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  4. 4 Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Western Cape, South Africa
  5. 5 Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
  6. 6 Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to Mr Ian Howard; ianhoward{at}outlook.com

Abstract

Introduction In South Africa (SA), prehospital emergency care is delivered by emergency medical services (EMS) across the country. Within these services, quality systems are in their infancy, and issues regarding transparency, reliability and contextual relevance have been cited as common concerns, exacerbated by poor communication, and ineffective leadership. As a result, we undertook a study to assess the current state of quality systems in EMS in SA, so as to determine priorities for initial focus regarding their development.

Methods A multiple exploratory case study design was used that employed the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s 18-point Quality Program Assessment Tool as both a formative assessment and semistructured interview guide using four provincial government EMS and one national private service.

Results Services generally scored higher for structure and planning. Measurement and improvement were found to be more dependent on utilisation and perceived mandate. There was a relatively strong focus on clinical quality assessment within the private service, whereas in the provincial systems, measures were exclusively restricted to call times with little focus on clinical care. Staff engagement and programme evaluation were generally among the lowest scores. A multitude of contextual factors were identified that affected the effectiveness of quality systems, centred around leadership, vision and mission, and quality system infrastructure and capacity, guided by the need for comprehensive yet pragmatic strategic policies and standards.

Conclusion Understanding and accounting for these factors will be key to ensuring both successful implementation and ongoing utilisation of healthcare quality systems in emergency care. The result will not only provide a more efficient and effective service, but also positively impact patient safety and quality of care of the services delivered.

  • ambulances
  • governance
  • prehospital care
  • qualitative research
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors conceived the study. IH conducted the data collection and analysis and takes responsibility for the paper. IH drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval Stellenbosch University Health Research Ethics Committee (Ref no. S15/09/193).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.