Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Decreasing birth asphyxia: utility of statistical process control in a low-resource setting
  1. Mariya Mukhtar-Yola1,
  2. Lamidi Isah Audu1,
  3. Oluyinka Olaniyan2,
  4. Henry T Akinbi3,
  5. Adekunle Dawodu4,
  6. Edward F Donovan5
  1. 1 Neonatal Unit, Department of Paediatrics, National Hospital Abuja (NHA), Abuja, Nigeria
  2. 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria
  3. 3 Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnatti, Ohio, USA
  4. 4 Global Health Center, CCHMC, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
  5. 5 James Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, CCHMC, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mariya Mukhtar-Yola; mariyamukhtar{at}yahoo.com

Abstract

The neonatal period is a critical time for survival of the child. A disproportionate amount of neonatal deaths occur in low-resource countries and are attributable to perinatal events, especially birth asphyxia. This project aimed to reduce the incidence of birth asphyxia by 20% by June 2014 through training in neonatal resuscitation and improving the availability of resuscitation equipment in the delivery room in the National Hospital Abuja, Nigeria.

A prospective, longitudinal study using statistical process control analytical methods was done enrolling babies delivered at the National Hospital Abuja.

Low Apgar scores or birth asphyxia (defined a priori as any score <7 at 1, 5 and/or at 10 min) was assessed. To ensure reliability and validity of Apgar scoring, trainings on scoring were held for labour and delivery staff. Interventions included provision of additional equipment and trainings on neonatal resuscitation. Apgar scores were aggregated weekly over 25 months. Control charts with three SE confidence limits were used to monitor the proportion of scores ≤7.

The baseline incidence of low Apgar scores, as defined a priori, was 33%, 17% and 10% while postintervention the incidence was 18%, 17% and 6% at 1, 5 and 10 min, respectively—a reduction of 45% and 40% in the 1-min and 10-min low Apgar scores.

Increased communication, additional resuscitation equipment and training of delivery personnel on neonatal resuscitation are associated with reductions in measures of birth asphyxia. These improvements have been sustained and efforts are ongoing to spread our interventions to other special care delivery units/nursery in adjoining states. Our study demonstrates the feasibility and utility of using improvement science methods to assess and improve perinatal outcome in low-resource settings.

  • continuing education, continuing professional development
  • paediatrics
  • quality improvement

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors contributed to the concept and design of the study. MM-Y, LIA and OY contributed to data collection. MM-Y, EFD, AD and HTA conducted the data analysis and interpretation, MM-Y did the manuscript preparation while all authors did the editing and critical review. MM-Y is the guarantor and takes responsibility for all aspects of the work.

  • Funding Partial funding was received from the National Hospital Abuja for Helping Babies Breath training, while Save The Children Nigeria supported the training with resuscitation tools and charts.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval Ethical approval was obtained from both Ethical Review Boards of NHA and CCHMC.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.