Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Interprofessional, student-led intervention to improve insulin prescribing to patients in an Acute Surgical Receiving Unit
  1. Vicki Tully1,2,
  2. Suaad Al-Salti3,
  3. Amy Arnold3,
  4. Shady Botros3,4,
  5. Iona Campbell1,
  6. Rachel Fane3,
  7. Iain Rowe3,
  8. Alison Strath3,
  9. Peter Davey1
  1. 1 School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
  2. 2 Patient Safety Team, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
  3. 3 School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
  4. 4 Pharmacy Department, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Peter Davey; p.g.davey{at}dundee.ac.uk

Abstract

Our aim was to test the feasibility of interprofessional, workplace-based learning about improvement through a 4-week placement for one medical and two pharmacy final year students in an Acute Surgical Receiving Unit (ASRU). The target was insulin because this is a common, high-risk medicine in this ASRU and the intervention was medicines reconciliation. Baseline data were collected from 10 patients and used to construct a cause and effect diagram and a process map through feedback and discussions with staff. Hypoglycaemia occurred in four patients but hyperglycaemia occurred in eight patients, of whom six were placed on intravenous insulin infusion (IVII). We estimated that £2454 could be saved by preventing one patient from going on IVII. The students designed and tested a sticker to improve medicines reconciliation for insulin patients. An online form was created to capture clinician feedback on the layout and usability of the sticker. The intervention was associated with improvements in the reliability of medicines reconciliation. The students’ work contributed to a larger project to reduce the risk of hypoglycaemia in the ASRU. This proved beneficial in enabling the students to engage with the clinical team. Nonetheless, it was challenging for students from two Universities to get a shared understanding of improvement methods and work effectively with the clinical team. The students said that they learnt more about quality improvement in a working healthcare environment than they would ever learn in a classroom and they valued the opportunity to work with students from other healthcare backgrounds in practice. Despite the additional staff time required to support students from two Universities, both have supported continuation of this work.

  • medical education
  • medication reconciliation
  • healthcare quality improvement
  • reminders
  • teamwork

CCBYNC

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors VT and PD (first and last authors) are coleads for the Patient Safety SSC (Student Selected Component). All other authors made equal contributions and are listed in alphabetical order by surname. VT, PD, AA, IR and AS designed the educational intervention and provided academic supervision for the students. SB designed the improvement intervention and was the clinical supervisor for the students. SA-S, IC and RF designed and tested the changes and measures for improvement. All authors contributed to writing up results and commented on drafts of the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement There are no additional data from this study.