Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Assessment of a quality improvement intervention to strengthen pharmaceutical human resources and improve availability and use of HIV medicines in Uganda
  1. John B Byabagambi1,
  2. Edward Broughton2,3,
  3. Simon Heltebeitel2,
  4. Tana Wuliji4,
  5. Esther Karamagi1
  1. 1USAID ASSIST Project, University Research Co., LLC, Kampala, Uganda
  2. 2USAID ASSIST Project, University Research Co., LLC, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA
  3. 3Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  4. 4Human Resources for Health, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Edward Broughton; ebroughton{at}urc-chs.com

Abstract

Inadequate medication dispensing and management by healthcare providers can contribute to poor outcomes among HIV-positive patients. Gaps in medication availability, often associated with pharmacy workforce shortages, are an important barrier to retention in HIV care in Uganda. An intervention to address pharmacy staffing constraints through strengthening pharmaceutical management, dispensing practices, and general competencies of facility clinical and pharmacy staff was implemented in 14 facilities in three districts in eastern Uganda. Teams of staff were organised in each facility and supported to apply quality improvement (QI) methods to address deficits in availability and rational use of HIV drugs. To evaluate the intervention, baseline and end line data were collected 24 months apart. Dispensing practices, clinical wellness and adherence to antiretrovirals improved by 45%, 28% and 20% from baseline to end line, respectively. All clients at end line received the medications prescribed, and medications were correctly, completely and legibly labelled more often. Clients better understood when, how much and for how long they were supposed to take their prescribed medicines at end line. Pharmaceutical management practices also improved from baseline in most categories by statistically significant margins. Facilities significantly improved on correctly recording stock information about antiretroviral drugs (53%vs100%, P<0.0001). Coinciding with existing staff taking on pharmaceutical roles, facilities improved management of unwanted and expired drugs, notably by optimising use of existing health workers and making pharmaceutical management processes more efficient. Implementation of this improvement intervention in the 14 facilities appeared to have a positive impact on client outcomes, pharmacy department management and providers’ self-reported knowledge of QI methods. These results were achieved at a cost of about US$5.50 per client receiving HIV services at participating facilities.

  • quality improvement
  • healthcare quality improvement
  • pharmacists

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Jessamy Bagenal

  • Contributors JBB, EB, TW and EK conceived and designed the study. JBB, EB and SH analysed the data. JBB, EB and SH wrote the paper.

  • Funding This study was funded by USAID (grant_number AID-OAA-A-12-00101).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Detail has been removed from these case descriptions to ensure anonymity. The editors and reviewers have seen the detailed information available and are satisfied that the information backs up the case the authors are making.

  • Ethics approval The improvement intervention posed minimal risk and were part of the programme activities that were approved by the Ugandan MoH and USAID who considered them operational activities exempt from the research ethical review process.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement All data collected during this study, including unpublished data, are available on request from the corresponding author.