Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Preventing cerebral palsy in preterm labour: a multiorganisational quality improvement approach to the adoption and spread of magnesium sulphate for neuroprotection
  1. Anna Burhouse1,
  2. Charlotte Lea2,
  3. Stephen Ray1,
  4. Hannah Bailey3,
  5. Ruth Davies4,
  6. Hannah Harding2,
  7. Rachel Howard5,
  8. Sharon Jordan6,
  9. Noshin Menzies1,
  10. Sarah White1,
  11. Kathryn Phillips1,
  12. Karen Luyt7
  1. 1 Quality Improvement, West of England Academic Health Science Network, Bristol, UK
  2. 2 Maternity, United Bristol Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
  3. 3 Maternity, Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust, Bath, UK
  4. 4 Maternity, Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, UK
  5. 5 Maternity, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK
  6. 6 Maternity, North Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
  7. 7 School of Clinical Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  1. Correspondence to Anna Burhouse; anna.burhouse{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Magnesium sulphate has been demonstrated to be an effective neuroprotectant for babies delivered prematurely (under 37 weeks’ gestational age). Antenatal administration reduces infant mortality and cerebral palsy (CP); however, uptake in the UK has been significantly lower than other countries. A quality improvement (QI) project (PReventing Cerebral palsy in Pre Term labour (PReCePT)) was carried out in the West of England, UK, to raise awareness of evidence and to improve the uptake of magnesium sulphate as neuroprotectant in preterm deliveries. Five National Health Service (NHS) Trusts and the West of England Academic Health Science Network participated in the QI project. The project was underpinned by a multifaceted QI approach that included: patient and clinical coproduction of resources; recruitment of clinical champions to support the local microsystems and create a stimulating/supporting environment for change; Plan, Do, Study, Act cycles; training for over 600 NHS staff and awareness raising and strategic influencing of key leaders. A baseline audit and regular measurement of the number of eligible women receiving magnesium sulphate was undertaken at each hospital site, and the overall programme was evaluated using data from an international benchmarking organisation for neonatal care outcomes—the Vermont Oxford Network. During the project 664 staff received magnesium sulphate training. The use of magnesium sulphate increased across the West of England from an average baseline of 21% over the 2 years preceding the project to 88% by the conclusion of the project. The project was also able to influence the development of a national data collection process for benchmarking the use of magnesium sulphate for neuroprotection in preterm deliveries in the U.K. PReCePT appears to have had a favourable effect on the uptake of magnesium sulphate across the West of England. The project has also provided learning about how to stimulate adoption and spread of evidence using a QI approach across a network.

  • obstetrics and gynecology
  • quality improvement methodologies
  • shared decision making
  • team training
  • quality measurement

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors This work is the result of a collaboration of staff from five NHS maternity units (KL, CL, HB, RD, HH, RH and SJ) and staff from the West of England Academic Health Science Network (AB, SR, NM, SW and KP) who all contributed to the planning and delivery of PreCePT and the data collection and reporting of the work described in the article. AB and Dr KL contributed to the literature search, data analysis and writing and are responsible for the overall content as guarantor(s).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval The project was subject to and meets the requirements of the NHS Research and Development Committee processes and ethical standards for service evaluation.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.