Discussion
In this QI initiative, we were able to bring down the MBD rate among VLBW infants in our NICU from baseline incidence of 35% to 19% by implementation of key driver interventions over a 2-year period.
Our interventions of enteral and parenteral supplementation of calcium and phosphorus for MBD prevention were derived from previously published reports. In India, there was no recommendation for routine fortification of EBM. The WHO and national bodies like National Neonatology Forum of India do not support the routine use of multicomponent fortification and recommend fortifier usage in <32 weeks and <1500 g who fail to gain adequate weight despite breast milk volume consumption of 180 mL/kg/day.10 In an online survey conducted in 2013 on the use of HMF in India, 104 tertiary care neonatal units participated. Overall, 88% neonatologists were using HMF in NICU, of which 11% used it routinely in babies with birth weight less than 1800 g, 32% of them used in all VLBW babies, and 43% used HMF as and when there is inadequate weight gain.11 Likewise, in our unit, the previous policy was to fortify EBM only if there was inadequate weight gain with full enteral volume of feeds.
Our baseline incidence of MBD (35%) among VLBW was similar to that published in literature of 16%–40%.5 Mitchell et al reported an incidence of 28% MBD among VLBW infants, of which 56% had radiological rickets.12 During period 1 (baseline period), the incidence of MBD was 35%. Only 11% of them were started on HMF for inadequate weight gain. The concerns were that the protein content of available HMFs was bovine in origin, the issues of increased osmolarity, feed intolerance, necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), contamination, infection and lack of regular supplies. The possible hazardous effect of feed intolerance or NEC was studied by other authors13 14 and showed that there was no significant increase in NEC rates or feed intolerance in the fortified group. This was discussed in team meetings and the same information was disseminated to all others in the unit.
Due to the non-availability of intravenous phosphorus preparation at that point of time, we proceeded to implement the first key driver intervention of enteral supplementation by routine fortification of EBM by day 14 of life during period 2 (PDSA 1). The intravenous preparation shortage appeared to be universal. Calcium gluconate and potassium phosphate were the top two in the list of parenteral nutrition products in short supply in the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition product survey.15 We followed the ‘standard’ type of fortification where HMF with fixed amount of macronutrients and micronutrients was added to breast milk on day 14 of life when babies would have achieved enteral feeds of at least 150 mL/kg/day. After the first intervention was done, the rate of MBD significantly reduced to 20% and was sustained for a duration of 1 year with MBD incidence of 21%.
In our NICU, it was a practice to start early aggressive TPN from day 1 of life for all VLBW infants. Though the association between parenteral calcium and phosphorus supplementation and prevention of short-term bone strength decline after birth in preterm infants has been emphasised in various studies,16 the non-availability of phosphate preparation prevented us from using parenteral calcium and phosphorus. During period 3, once the availability of parenteral preparations was assured, we implemented the second key driver intervention of parenteral calcium and phosphorus supplementation in TPN from day 1 (PDSA 2). Multiple other interventions, which were identified after the PDSA 2 towards reduction of MBD rate, were also implemented. Measures undertaken included further enhanced enteral supplementation of calcium and phosphorus by adding HMF earlier at 100 mL/kg/day feeds (PDSA 3), aiming to achieve AAP recommendations for calcium and phosphorus,8 which was higher than the ESPGHAN recommendations which was used earlier. Like other authors, we faced solubility issues with parenteral calcium and phosphorus preparations. There was precipitation seen in the TPN fluid twice, which was analysed. Once it was the excess amount of phosphorus (exceeding the recommended 1.7:1 molar ratio of calcium to phosphorus), and in the second instance, it was probably procedural and did not occur when TPN was reconstituted again.
The compliance with the interventions improved significantly with regular appraisals and group discussions. There was a stepwise increase in compliance with adding HMF from baseline 11% in period 1 to 83% and 91% in period 2 and period 3, respectively. The compliance with starting parenteral calcium and phosphorus in TPN increased and reached 100% during period 3. Due to logistic reasons, HMF was not available for 10 days during period 3 and was addressed in the weekly group meetings.
During period 3, MBD rate dropped further to 17% from 20%, after the implementation of parenteral supplementation of calcium and phosphorus in TPN, though during the sustainability period, the MBD rate again increased to 21%. This could have been due to higher proportion of ELBW neonates in this period. The cumulative calcium and phosphorus intake over the entire period of 8 weeks showed that the intake had increased significantly between period 2 and period 3. This is attributed to adding calcium and phosphorus in TPN from day 1 of life, as well as bridging the gap between parenteral and full volume enteral feeds by early fortification at 100 mL/kg of feeds. The change in the unit protocol to supplement as per AAP recommendations,8 which aimed for higher calcium and phosphorus supplementation, compared with ESPGHAN,6 would also have contributed.
The incidence of MBD among ELBW is always higher. It has been estimated as 55% based on bone mineral content.5 McIntosh et al (1981–1985), in an observational study of ELBW infants, reported 47.5% incidence of radiological rickets,17 while in a more recent retrospective observational study by Viswanathan et al, reported MBD rate of 31% among ELBW infants using QUS.4 Our baseline incidence of MBD among ELBW babies (82%) was higher, probably because we used biochemical parameters for the diagnosis.
Studies have shown that infants treated with methylxanthines and furosemide cause increased urinary calcium excretion, thereby increasing risk of MBD.18 19 In our study, the usage of methylxanthine had increased during period 3 compared with period 2 because we had a greater number of ELBW babies in the intervention 2 group, in whom methylxanthine usage is higher. Usage of diuretics and postnatal steroids was limited. A recent study20 has suggested that physical activity programmes reduce demineralisation in VLBW babies. We did not have a dedicated physical activity programme for promoting bone mineralisation.
Balancing effect
We faced solubility issues with parenteral calcium and phosphorus in TPN twice. Both the times the TPN worksheet was rechecked, and the staff nurse educated on the procedure of adding calcium and phosphorus in TPN. None of the babies had hypercalcaemia.
Strength of the study
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first QI intervention towards reducing MBD rate.
The overall generalisability of this project is high. It is feasible, low cost and has potential for high benefit.
Limitation of the study
The incidence of MBD was based on ALP values and the bone mineral content could not be measured.
We initiated both PDSA 2 and PDSA 3 at the same time; hence, individual effects on the MBD rate could not be ascertained.
The sample size of the study was small especially during PDSA 2 and 3; hence, we could not demonstrate a statistically significant change in the outcome.
Lessons learnt and challenges faced
We faced many challenges during the implementation of the QI project. First and foremost was the change in the policy of fortification of EBM for all VLBW infants, that is, adding HMF to EBM by day 14 of life in PDSA 1. It was very challenging to convince all the consultants as there were serious disagreements and concerns of feed intolerance and risk of NEC. This was even more obvious during PDSA 2 and 3 when HMF was added to EBM very early when the feed volume of 100 mL/kg/day was reached, mostly during the first week of life. We had a meeting with all consultants and stakeholders and reviewed the present literature on multicomponent fortification. The residents and postgraduates were made to present the literature and evidence on multicomponent fortification. Seminars and journal clubs were presented. We also made use of the social media, created a separate WhatsApp group for the same where everyone could put in their queries, and articles with supporting evidence were posted for the same. This helped us to convince everyone in the neonatal team and thus the change in policy was adopted. We faced problems in procuring intravenous phosphorus preparation when the project was implemented. Hence, we had to proceed with enteral supplementation first and take up parenteral supplementation later in PDSA 2 when intravenous phosphorus was available. There was also scarcity of HMF sachets supplied owing to the economic condition of India at that point of time. A lot of logistic issues had to be addressed during the study which we did not anticipate. We did face precipitation issues in TPN a couple of times when calcium and phosphorus were added. We had to review the process of TPN preparation and go through each and every step to find out the problem. We also made the pharmacist and the in-charge nurse to reprepare the TPN to see if it occurs again. All the doctors and staff were educated and same was demonstrated to everyone. If we were to undertake this project again, we would probably start by ensuring a steady supply of intravenous phosphorus and HMF sachets in the pharmacy first. We would also like to review the current literature on the definition, pathophysiology, investigations and management of this MBD in VLBW neonates owing to the chronicity of the disease and the rapidly changing evidence and concepts in the field of neonatology, so that we are updated and we adopt to the state-of-the-art guidelines for the same, making diagnosis and management accurate. We hope that our work leaves a positive impact and motivates others to take up this project to reduce the problem of MBD in preterm neonates.