Responses

Download PDFPDF

Improving access to pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prescribing in a primary care setting
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Improving access to PrEP using a pharmacist-centric model

    The Virginia Mason Medical Center’s Department of Primary Care partnered with their Proudly VM LGBTQIA+ interest group to increase the number of patients receiving new PrEP prescriptions in Seattle. VM’s initiative targeted PCPs instead of pharmacist as the main touch point for PrEP prescribing citing scope of practice concerns (Lumsden et al., 2022). The Lumsden article demonstrated that the program helped to increase new PrEP prescriptions but there were limitations. Research indicates that Pharmacist may be better positioned than PCPs to not only increase new PrEP prescriptions, but also increase PrEP adherence.

    Nationally, the scope of care for pharmacist has been expanded through collaborative practice agreements (CPA). CPAs allow pharmacist to fulfil additional responsibilities under the supervision of a physician. Washington is 1 of 48 states that have legalized CPAs, which despite Lumsden’s findings would allow VM to empower pharmacist to be more involved in the recruitment and retention of PrEP patients (Lopez et al., 2020).

    Over 90% of Americans live within 5 miles of a pharmacy; making pharmacies one of the most accessible healthcare entry points (Tung et al., 2018). Moreover, populations that have high risk for HIV, such as POC LGBTQ+ individuals and intravenous drug users, tend to live in disadvantaged neighborhoods that have fewer physicians (Crawford et al., 2020). This population is likely to rely on resources that are easy to access within...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.