Coronary artery disease
Impact of Delay in Door-to-Needle Time on Mortality in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.05.043Get rights and content

Fibrinolytic therapy is the most common reperfusion strategy for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), particularly in smaller centers. Previous studies evaluated the relation between time to treatment and outcomes when few patients were treated within 30 minutes of hospital arrival and many did not receive modern adjunctive medications. To quantify the impact of a delay in door-to-needle time on mortality in a recent and representative cohort of patients with STEMI, a cohort of 62,470 patients with STEMI treated using fibrinolytic therapy at 973 hospitals that participated in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1999 to 2002 was analyzed. Hierarchical models were used to evaluate the independent effect of door-to-needle time on in-hospital mortality. In-hospital mortality was lower with shorter door-to-needle times (2.9% for ≤30 minutes, 4.1% for 31 to 45 minutes, and 6.2% for >45 minutes; p <0.001 for trend). Compared with those experiencing door-to-needle times ≤30 minutes, adjusted odd ratios (ORs) of dying were 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04 to 1.31) and 1.37 (95% CI 1.23 to 1.52; p for trend <0.001) for patients with door-to-needle times of 31 to 45 and >45 minutes, respectively. This relation was particularly pronounced in those presenting within 1 hour of symptom onset to presentation time (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.54; OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.87, respectively; p for trend <0.001). In conclusion, timely administration of fibrinolytic therapy continues to significantly impact on mortality in the modern era, particularly in patients presenting early after symptom onset.

Section snippets

Methods

We used the NRMI, a voluntary acute myocardial infarction (AMI) registry sponsored by Genentech, Inc. (South San Francisco, California), to define a cohort of patients with STEMI who received acute fibrinolytic reperfusion therapy. NRMI criteria13, 14 included a diagnosis of AMI according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (code 410.X1) and any of total creatine kinase or creatine kinase-MB ≥2 times the upper limit of the normal range or

Results

Table 1 lists demographic, clinical, and presentation characteristics of the cohort. Nearly half the patients (47%) were treated within the guideline-recommended 30 minutes (Figure 1). In unadjusted analysis, shorter door-to-needle time was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (p <0.001 for trend; Figure 2). In-hospital mortality rates were 8.2% in patients with door-to-needle times >100 minutes and 2.5% in patients treated within 15 minutes (test for trend p <0.001). Shorter

Discussion

Fibrinolytic therapy is the most common form of reperfusion therapy for patients presenting with STEMI.12 In this large, well-characterized, and recent cohort of patients with STEMI with a high rate of proven therapies, in-hospital mortality was significantly lower for patients treated within shorter door-to-needle times. This association was found regardless of time from symptom onset to hospital presentation and was particularly strong in those presenting within 1 hour of symptom onset. The

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (65)

  • Regional Systems of Care in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

    2021, Interventional Cardiology Clinics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Nevertheless, the primary goal of timely reperfusion remains paramount to effective STEMI care and is the cornerstone for guiding the administration of thrombolytic therapy as the initial reperfusion strategy. Several studies have demonstrated a positive mortality impact with earlier administration of thrombolytic therapy when pPCI is not readily available.33–35 Furthermore, the benefits of thrombolytic therapy are most pronounced for patients presenting within the first 12 hours of symptom onset.

  • Patient, provider, and environmental factors associated with adherence to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular clinical practice guidelines in the ED

    2018, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Exclusion criteria were age < 18 years of age, ED disposition other than admission, and patients transferred from another facility as the initial management would not have occurred in the included EDs. To maximize validity and reliability of the medical record abstraction process, we used the following established methodologies: [1] physician abstractors, blinded to the purpose of the study, to ensure expert familiarity with medical records and documentation; [2] abstractors trained by the lead author (ST) using a set of “test cases” to standardize approaches; [3] use of a previously developed and refined closed-response data collection instrument; [4] performance of 10 pilot reviews, using actual cases sampled from each hospital but not included for analysis in order to gain familiarity with each hospital's medical record system; [5] re-abstraction of 15% of included cases to estimate intra-abstractor agreement, with the intention of performing re-abstraction with adjudication of 100% of the cases if agreement of the 15% is less than excellent (kappa < 0.8); and [6] routine oversight of the abstractor team by the lead author (ST), who was also available throughout the data collection process to address questions and problems that may arise [17,18]. Using a structured data abstraction form, abstractors documented the presence of all pre-specified variables necessary to assess adherence with each CPG.

View all citing articles on Scopus

This work was supported by Grant No. R01HL072575 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, approved the study and provided access to the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction database at no charge; however, Genentech did not provide direct support for the study. Dr. Peterson receives research funding from Schering Plough, Kenilworth, New Jersey, BMS/Sanofi Aventis, New York, New York, and Merck-Schering, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey. Dr. Blaney is employed by Genentech, Inc. Dr. Frederick is employed by Ovation Research Group, Seattle, Washington, which receives research funding from Genentech.

View full text