Coronary artery diseaseImpact of Delay in Door-to-Needle Time on Mortality in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Section snippets
Methods
We used the NRMI, a voluntary acute myocardial infarction (AMI) registry sponsored by Genentech, Inc. (South San Francisco, California), to define a cohort of patients with STEMI who received acute fibrinolytic reperfusion therapy. NRMI criteria13, 14 included a diagnosis of AMI according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (code 410.X1) and any of total creatine kinase or creatine kinase-MB ≥2 times the upper limit of the normal range or
Results
Table 1 lists demographic, clinical, and presentation characteristics of the cohort. Nearly half the patients (47%) were treated within the guideline-recommended 30 minutes (Figure 1). In unadjusted analysis, shorter door-to-needle time was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (p <0.001 for trend; Figure 2). In-hospital mortality rates were 8.2% in patients with door-to-needle times >100 minutes and 2.5% in patients treated within 15 minutes (test for trend p <0.001). Shorter
Discussion
Fibrinolytic therapy is the most common form of reperfusion therapy for patients presenting with STEMI.12 In this large, well-characterized, and recent cohort of patients with STEMI with a high rate of proven therapies, in-hospital mortality was significantly lower for patients treated within shorter door-to-needle times. This association was found regardless of time from symptom onset to hospital presentation and was particularly strong in those presenting within 1 hour of symptom onset. The
References (19)
- et al.
Impact of time to treatment with tissue plasminogen activator on morbidity and mortality following acute myocardial infarction (The Second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction)
Am J Cardiol
(1998) - et al.
Association of duration of symptoms at presentation with angiographic and clinical outcomes after fibrinolytic therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2004) - et al.
ACC/AHA Clinical Performance Measures for Adults With ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures on ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction)
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2006) - et al.
Hospital improvement in time to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, 1999–2002
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2006) - et al.
Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hour
Lancet
(1996) - et al.
Factors associated with delay in reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: analysis of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project
Am Heart J
(2000) - et al.
A comparison of the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 with the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1999) Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction
Lancet
(1986)GISSI-2: a factorial randomised trial of alteplase versus streptokinase and heparin versus no heparin among 12,490 patients with acute myocardial infarction
Lancet
(1990)
Cited by (65)
The Potentially Harmful Dimension of Pauci-Symptomatic Aortic Dissection
2021, American Journal of MedicineRegional Systems of Care in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
2021, Interventional Cardiology ClinicsCitation Excerpt :Nevertheless, the primary goal of timely reperfusion remains paramount to effective STEMI care and is the cornerstone for guiding the administration of thrombolytic therapy as the initial reperfusion strategy. Several studies have demonstrated a positive mortality impact with earlier administration of thrombolytic therapy when pPCI is not readily available.33–35 Furthermore, the benefits of thrombolytic therapy are most pronounced for patients presenting within the first 12 hours of symptom onset.
Patient, provider, and environmental factors associated with adherence to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular clinical practice guidelines in the ED
2018, American Journal of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :Exclusion criteria were age < 18 years of age, ED disposition other than admission, and patients transferred from another facility as the initial management would not have occurred in the included EDs. To maximize validity and reliability of the medical record abstraction process, we used the following established methodologies: [1] physician abstractors, blinded to the purpose of the study, to ensure expert familiarity with medical records and documentation; [2] abstractors trained by the lead author (ST) using a set of “test cases” to standardize approaches; [3] use of a previously developed and refined closed-response data collection instrument; [4] performance of 10 pilot reviews, using actual cases sampled from each hospital but not included for analysis in order to gain familiarity with each hospital's medical record system; [5] re-abstraction of 15% of included cases to estimate intra-abstractor agreement, with the intention of performing re-abstraction with adjudication of 100% of the cases if agreement of the 15% is less than excellent (kappa < 0.8); and [6] routine oversight of the abstractor team by the lead author (ST), who was also available throughout the data collection process to address questions and problems that may arise [17,18]. Using a structured data abstraction form, abstractors documented the presence of all pre-specified variables necessary to assess adherence with each CPG.
Risk Factors for Major Adverse Cardiac Events Outcomes in Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention during Index Admission
2023, Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences
This work was supported by Grant No. R01HL072575 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, approved the study and provided access to the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction database at no charge; however, Genentech did not provide direct support for the study. Dr. Peterson receives research funding from Schering Plough, Kenilworth, New Jersey, BMS/Sanofi Aventis, New York, New York, and Merck-Schering, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey. Dr. Blaney is employed by Genentech, Inc. Dr. Frederick is employed by Ovation Research Group, Seattle, Washington, which receives research funding from Genentech.