Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Implementation of a mock root cause analysis to provide simulated patient safety training
  1. Martina Murphy1,
  2. Jennifer Duff1,
  3. Julie Whitney2,
  4. Benjamin Canales3,
  5. Merry-Jennifer Markham4,
  6. Julia Close1
  1. 1 Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida and the North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Administration (NF/SGVA), Gainesville, Florida, USA
  2. 2 North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Administration, Gainesville, Florida, USA
  3. 3 Department of Urology, University of Florida and the North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Administration (NF/SGVA), Gainesville, Florida, USA
  4. 4 Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Martina Murphy; martina.murphy{at}medicine.ufl.edu

Abstract

Background The proposed revision to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Common Program Requirements includes participation in real or simulated patient safety activities, such as root cause analysis (RCA).1 Because exposure to RCA may occur with low frequency, a mock RCA was developed and piloted for feasibility with Hematology/Oncology fellows.

Objective To improve trainee knowledge of the goals and application of RCA in patient safety and quality improvement through a simulated experience.

Methods A mock RCA was implemented with Hematology/Oncology fellows over two subsequent years. In small groups, they reviewed a case involving an adverse event and identified sources of harm. Additional details, in the form of provider interviews, were available upon request. Trainees identified the root cause(s) and proposed measurable changes. Teams presented proposals to peers and a panel representing hospital leadership. Feedback was provided. Trainees completed evaluations and were surveyed regarding their perceptions.

Results Thirteen of 15 fellows completed the survey. Twelve of 13 (92%) fellows felt the mock RCA improved their comfort level for participation in a real RCA. Ten of 13 fellows (77%) reported increased awareness and likelihood of reporting near misses and/or adverse events following participation. More thorough patient care documentation following the session was reported by 8 of 13 (62%).

Conclusion A pilot trial of a mock RCA with Hematology/Oncology fellows had high trainee satisfaction. Post-session surveys and informal interviews suggest trainees have reduced anxiety when faced with participation in a real RCA and have more interest in the process after participation.

  • continuous quality improvement
  • graduate medical education
  • medical education
  • near miss
  • quality improvement

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors MM, JD, JC and JW planned and delivered the curriculum. BC provided urology-specific content. MM and JC conducted the survey. MJM provided editorial review. MM submitted the final manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.